this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
87 points (96.8% liked)

Futurology

1743 readers
118 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

There's no reason it couldn't work with any animal.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ethical research guidelines bar any attempts to culture human embryos beyond 14 days of gestation, so as usual it’s clickbait and not something that will be explored anytime soon.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

All it takes is one eccentric billionaire that wants to clone themself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

As a general concept, sure. Actually making it happen in a petri dish can be detail-intensive and unreliable, which is why we haven't been doing it routinely for decades.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Oh, is that how they make new customers? That tracks.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Sure is a brave new world

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Synthetic embryos are clones, too—of the starting cells you grow them from. But they’re made without the need for eggs and can be created in far larger numbers—in theory, by the tens of thousands. And that’s what could revolutionize cattle breeding. Imagine that each year’s calves were all copies of the most muscled steer in the world, perfectly designed to turn grass into steak.

“I would love to see this become cloning 2.0,” says Carlos Pinzón-Arteaga, the veterinarian who spearheaded the laboratory work in Texas.

The article said it was not just for cattle, more for general science research.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago