this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
38 points (95.2% liked)

United Kingdom

4004 readers
184 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 months ago

Nasty Party targets the poor and vulnerable again. It's a shame that they don't show the same efforts in going after the corporates avoiding tax.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago

“And by taking verification out of the hands of GPs we’ll make sure they stay unverified”

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Vouchers for shops instead of money and increased access to care for the worthy are not compassion.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm stupid but pip was only brought in just over ten years ago as a way to reform the system and prevent "scroungers and cheats" by the Tory's, surely by pushing reform now that's all but admitting they're thick as shite and and they're deliberately targeting vulnerable people. How does the electorate not see this?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

More to the point. Pip is specifically designed to measure your indevidual ability to cope. Clear.y based on there attempt to ignore it.

He recently compared rejected results not to 2010 saying there is no way such a high % can pass now but not them.

Well that because the courts kept telling them they were breaking g the law whe they rejected folks around 2010.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


After a massive rise in the number of adults reporting disabilities and claiming help through personal independence payments (Pip), the prime minister said those with “less severe” conditions should be engaged in the world of work.

The annual cost of the payment system is currently at around £22bn, and is forecast to rise by 50 per cent over the next four years as more people, including those with mental health concerns, qualify for the support.

In an interview with ITV’s Robert Peston, Mr Sunak said: “The broad thrust of what we’re trying to do is say, hang on, you can’t be making claims based on unverifiable assertions.

When pressed on the hardship that vulnerable people on low incomes would endure without Pip, he said: “That’s why it’s so important that we stick to our plan that’s easing the burden on the cost of living.”

Alongside the paper, Mr Stride also addressed the Commons, saying: “This government’s priority is to make sure that our welfare system is fair and compassionate.

Dr Sarah Hughes, chief executive of the charity Mind, said the proposal would “only make things worse” for millions of people struggling with mental health.


The original article contains 856 words, the summary contains 194 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!