this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
59 points (81.7% liked)

Technology

58011 readers
3235 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Those are very different things….

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yea, I am very confused by the headline. Maybe if it compared Openshift to Kubernetes...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But Kubernetes has nothing to do with HasiCorp?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

HashiCorp Nomad is a competitor to Kubernetes: https://www.nomadproject.io/

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Interesting, never heard of it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I used to run it at home. It’s actually kinda nice.

I think Roblox runs it’s infrastructure on it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is it worth checking out? Any advantages/disadvantages over Kubernetes?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah worth considering, gets stuff done with less complexity than k8s. Teams that choose it seem to delivery more quickly IME.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Thanks, I'll try it out

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

pretty different things and also IBM owns Red Hat

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Hashicorp's Nomad is a k8s competitor. It has pretty nice tooling that is simplier than k8s, and directly supportes vms, containers, war files, etc.

It's pretty common for companies to buy up their competitors, so IBM already owning openshift/etc and still making the purchase makes sense.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

It's pretty common for companies to buy up their competitors

Capitalism "competition drives innovation" at its finest

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

The title is super confusing, it looks like Kubernetes is part of Red Hat

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I’m tired and OP’s title case is messing with my brain.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

If I were to rank HashiCorp's products by importance, Nomad would not be at the top

Of course, if I had ranked Red Hat's products by importance at the time of acquisition, OpenShift would not have been at the top, so I am not a reliable ranker