this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
2058 points (99.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32964 readers
478 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 332 points 2 years ago (8 children)

A highly compatible design with no ads, unnecessary images, videos, animations, scripts that goes straight to point delivering you exactly the information you need and nothing else? Something that's easily accessible even with old feature phones allowing older people to get information easily?
Simply something that loads instantly and just works?

Who would want that?

[–] [email protected] 138 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Found the backend dev. "CUT THIS AESTHETICS NONSENSE! GIMME THE VARIABLE CONTENTS ALREADY! WE'RE 3.54 NANOSECONDS BEHIND!"

[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Frontend: "Come on, this needs at least some flair. This isn't the 90s."

Throws React at it

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago

React ugh, everybody is using NextJs these da- ....oh, what's that? We've moved on already?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No one who is going to pay you wants that. All they care about is user engagement.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 145 points 2 years ago (4 children)

The page at the top looks perfectly fine. It's useful, it gets the job done and it's lightweight.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago

It's almost fine. It needs to include units for the measurements.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You sound like a backend developer.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 116 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Good, that we have specialists for both and nobody is advocating that everyone should be doing full-stack work... oh wait.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Full-stack development and devops: When you need an entire IT department but only want to pay for one person.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 years ago (2 children)

As a full stack developer I can assure you I can easily produce the result displayed in both those panels in the image 😏

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

"Full-stack" is just a term invented by stingy employers who try to get 2 for the price of 1

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 114 points 2 years ago (5 children)

what is wrong with this frontend? not enough ads? loads too quickly?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 years ago

I would hire you as my lawyer.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago

No cookie banner with the worst dark patterns of UX imaginable

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 105 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 2 years ago

As a backend developer who occasionally has to work on the frontend, that top image is pretty accurate although it requires bootstrap smeared all over to pretty things up a bit. After that it will have the "Good Enough" seal of approval.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 2 years ago (1 children)

God I wish weather pages were more like that first one.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I like to use this one: https://wttr.in/

You can get info for a specific city by appending it like this: https://wttr.in/newyork

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

in Paris

in Paris

in Paris

in Paris

What is this bloat? Trash site.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Honestly you don't even need to make the text field visible. If they can't touch-type that's on them.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I would prefer a dropdown list of all possible coordinate combinations.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Pfft just go there and feel the air yourself. Knowing the weather in advance is bloat anyway. If medieval sailors could launch ships without weather info and survive 30% of the time, you can too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I can make HTML look alright if I have to and it's simple enough requirements.

The real hell is making it look good in an email. Oh, you used something from the last 20 years of HTML/CSS progress? Well fuck you.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 years ago

Looks like a perfectly fine frontend to me.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

After some time toying with CSS I have decided to fuck it and whenever I need to make a website I will just either:

  • Make a plain website with no virtually no styling.
  • Use bootstrap or some other similar shit.
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago

No bloat, no Javashit, no problem

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago (5 children)

From my experience, devs be like:

Backend, yay! Frontend, nay! ... and I the end, not even the backend works properly.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So in the end, it doesn't even matter?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›