this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
245 points (90.4% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35592 readers
909 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Essentially the apps have same package name but different signatures and the app store that installed it should be the only one to recognize and update it.

But Google is likely trying this dark pattern to sway people away from F-Droid or alt stores by making users uninstall these apps and install it from the Google Play Store.

It's been going on for a while and is annoying af.

https://android.stackexchange.com/questions/253727/why-is-googles-play-store-suddenly-trying-to-update-apps-installed-via-f-droid

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stez827 106 points 8 months ago (3 children)

It's just cause it has the same package name and only checks the signature on attempt to install not cause Google has some alterior motive

[–] [email protected] 54 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

interior crocodile alligator i drive a chevrolet movie theater

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Interior crocodile alligator, I drive a Chevrolet movie theater

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stez827 3 points 8 months ago

Thx lol my grammar is ass even though it's the only language I speak haha

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And, F-Droid shows apps that were installed from the Play Store.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Because they both use the same package names...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

All the more reason to not complain when Google Play does it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (6 children)

It's relatively new behaviour so they introduced it recently. And they need to fix it, but ignore it entirely...

[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Mismatched signatures have been discouraged since day one of Android. A mismatched signature is a sign that some one other than the original publisher built this package, and the user needs to be aware that it might be malicious.

That F-Droid went with this setup with mismatched signatures was always going to make their apks look suspicious.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Even if it's new behavior, there is really no reason to assume that this was done to evoke some dark pattern or other. It just shows that Google will not think about 3rd party stores when they do anything with their services and that is hardly news, is it? Besides: I kinda get it honestly. If they'd take all the stuff out there for android into account before they did anything, nothing would be done at all.

So the question becomes less why that's there, but more what stores like Samsung do to prevent this issue and if F-Droid can adapt the same behavior.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Samsung just says:

Can't auto update Installed from Google play store. And Can't auto update Installed from Aurora store.

You can easily see from what store an app has been installed in android.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Since I found out about F-Droid and Aurora Store, I'm actively dodging the Play Store. No one will ever make me use it. Ads, promos, junk everywhere! And their shitty way of updating.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

either download the official APK from f-droid.org or use the NeoStore app which is a better client imho. from there its some simple setup and basically works like the play store.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Droid-ify is my personal favorite client. You can opt in to many other repos like IzzyOnDroid (pic below) It's also material design, which I like aha.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Has Aurora been improved since last year?

I tried to love it, but it was such a pita to actually update things. Like, it hardly actually updated without errors or issues. When it did "update" an app, I wouldn't be able to actually open it. After it broke some important apps I was using, I uninstalled it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's because they are using like 10 disposable Google accounts shared between all the users in the world, so access is throttled

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uuhhhhmmmm 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But Google is likely trying this dark pattern to sway people away from F-Droid or alt stores by making users uninstall these apps and install it from the Google Play Store.

No, it's the security measure. Anyone can use existing package ID. If the user installs a different app with the same package ID as the other, that new app just overwrites the old app and will have access to the sensitive data of it.

F-Droid apps are built and signed by the people at F-Droid. Apps from Google Play and GitHub are built and signed by the developers themselves. You can update Google Play apps from GitHub and vice versa. That's why I use Obtainium over F-Droid.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

It shouldnt try to update a different signature app at the first place

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is an f-droid problem. If they use the same package name, they need to use the same signature. That has been the case since long before f-droid existed.

They could just build apks with alternate package names and this wouldn't be an issue.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's no problem, since you don't want 2 stores to update the same app.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's a problem of trust. Differing signature is an indication of third party tampering. People shouldn't start to see difference in signatures as an ordinary occurrence. It should be an high alert event.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Nope.
Often versions on Play Store are slightly different (telemetry). Sometimes they even have different versioning.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

Then, using a different package name should be a good solution, wouldn't it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yeah the worst part of it is that the version on Google Play is actually the older version.

They are shown on the update page for Google's benefits only. This is anti customer.

[–] Stez827 5 points 8 months ago

It's not though it's because the developers use the same package name for the f-droid and play store versions but when the play store checks the signature before installing it sees it doesn't match and it fails if the developers used different package names for play store and f-droid this would not be an issue

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] southsamurai 10 points 8 months ago

Jokes on them, I don't want them updating anything without my direct approval, and I don't insist on the most recent version of anything non critical. Idgaf about their bullshit

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why would anyone who actively chose to install F-droid, reinstall their apps as Play Store apps?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Fedilab and Thumb-key are not free on Google Play, I would reinstall them there if it was possible

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Actually, I had it just the other way around. I had an app that had an old, orphaned version on F-Droid and a newer one on Play Store, so I installed the one from the Play store, but F-Droid desperately tried to update it constantly, always failing, always spamming me with messages about it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I don't care that it can't update these apps, since I use Obtainium. But, FFS, at least let users have an option to ignore or hide those apps.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

I use F-Droid and i don't care that it can't update theese apps over google play. I can still use fdroid to update

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Yes exactly.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Yes because they are signed with different keys

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

The same happens in reverse. It's the natural result of not naming the packages differently as a dev.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

I have this happening on Sync for Lemmy. Every time I open it if there's an update available, with no way to tell Play to fuck off.

load more comments
view more: next ›