this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
322 points (90.9% liked)

Tattletale Times

168 readers
44 users here now

TattletaleTimes.com - Your go-to source for hilarious satire news on the chaotic world of kids and parenting.

Subscribe on Twitter, Insta, Facebook, Reddit, Mastodon, and here!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 103 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (25 children)

Women, you can wear men's underwear, it's legal!

Use the front pouch as a bun warmer. You're welcome.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago (2 children)

My wife puts her phone in the dick hole (no idea what it's called) when she has her hands full

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

My wife named hers 'Orange Julius'

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

i never thought about it that way...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wait, when you say bun warmer, how do you mean that?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Put a piece of bread down there for safe keeping and your body heat will keep it warm!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

Most people’s buns are in back

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] starman2112 50 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

In an era where women have been grappling with the pocket predicament for years, Hanes seems to have missed the memo. The company’s decision to provide men with the luxury of pockets in even more male clothing has left women pondering the inequality of men having access to cargo shorts while most of women’s clothing has no pockets at all.

Literally nobody is going to stop you from trying on and buying cargo pants. You've always had access to cargo pants. You just need to buy what you want, and not what society deems appropriate.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Well what if I want relatively cute clothes that also just so happen to have usable pockets?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago (2 children)

They make them, it’s just each company that focuses on making them ends up going under, with a new one eventually taking their place, because not enough people are buying these designs.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I find more and more in my life that decisions made by very opinionated "designers" often dominate much more than most people realize, and I honestly think that's a fairly big reason behind why a lot of name brand stores skimp on the pockets. God forbid someone be seen wearing their Women's premium shorts with—gasp—a phone bulge?

It's kind of one of those things where convention follows convention for convention's sake, and likewise with innovations where it's safe for the bottom line. It's really hard to start a fashion brand; it's a really, really oversaturated market. The issue is that if a company makes the "we have pockets!" its whole shtick, that that's a very specific sticking point and doesn't necessarily mean what they make is good.

I also don't think I need to mention the side benefit to clothing brands that less pocket space makes handbags a de-facto requirement and thus another thing to be sold. Again, of course you can buy whichever clothes of which men's will have pockets abound, but like, there's a certain base level of wanting something fashionable that I think is reasonable, and that most men's clothing fails to achieve even for their target gender.

[–] azertyfun 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Men's clothing sucks ass. Walk into H&M, there's 500 m² of women's clothing for literally everything you can imagine, then there's a little corner with: jeans (blue), jeans (dark blue), jeans (light blue), t-shirt (gray), t-shirt (dark gray), suit (black).

Then the neckbeards on Lemmy who exclusively wear the aforementioned fashion graveyard are like "just buy women's clothing", completely missing the fact that the average man does not even fit in most women's clothes. And even if he does, it'll probably be with a super saggy waistline and chest area (or saggy everything because most clothes assume tall=fat).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Men's clothing doesn't always fit women's shapes.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Cargo pants have no shape?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Mens clothing don't always fit men either that's why we have belts

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 months ago (7 children)

none of my damn dresses have even the smallest of pockets. it's bullshit

[–] [email protected] 53 points 4 months ago (3 children)

the purse industry is in on this conspiracy

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They literally are, this has been going on for a long time

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

But now you can wear this pocketed briefs under your dress!

[–] fsxylo 8 points 4 months ago (7 children)

I know this doesn't really solve the overall problem, but on Etsy you can find pocket belts. Essentially adding a cool looking pocket to your outfit.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago (2 children)

That sounds kinda cool actually, for being around the house.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I do often feel like I could use pockets when I'm only wearing underwear

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This is a real need. It’s so annoying having to carry your phone by hand when you’re going from one room to another

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I tuck mine between the waistband and my body.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The picture is actually workout shorts with a liner pocket for your phone which I am legally wearing as I type this.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What do you illegally wear?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

Lol, OSHA says it's dangerous materials, handle with caution

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I don't get this bs response. Too often have I seen my female friends buy terrible clothing. Yes women's clothing fucking sucks, but some women manage to find even worse articles than the regular flimsy thin fabric that still manages to feel tight even when it is too big for you. Extra points for poor insulation and confusing parts. They enable that impractical pocketless shit.

I found clothes that better accomodate my wide ass in the men's section, then I ever have in the woman's section. I found the best swimming top, in the sports bra section as the swimming gear was just the same flimsy design. Who in their right minds would buy a top marketed for surfing, when the thing is only held together by a weak elastic rope made from the same fabric? You fall off once and your top disappears from existance.

I found that clothing in the woman's section is uncomfortable, even when it's too big for me. At least in the men's, I find clothes that are comfortable, even if it looks bad on me. I'm done with looking good.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Feeling comfy will make you look good

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Am I missing a part of the joke or are there a lot of people here who don't understand Tattletale is a satire site?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This post is the first I've heard of 'em.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's the first time I have as well, but check the other articles on the site. Also, this lemmy channel's description.

Your go-to source for hilarious satire news on the chaotic world of kids and parenting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Crash testing in vehicles are done based on the male physiology. Women are more likely to die in a crash because of this.

One 2019 study published in the journal Traffic Injury Prevention found that women are 73% more likely to be seriously injured in a crash compared to men.

https://abc7chicago.com/crash-test-dummies-car-women-in-crashes-safety-of/14553933/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Kinda unrelated, but I found underwear at Walmart that has a holder for your cock n balls.

Absolute game changer.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Having read the article, I'm 98% sure this is parody.

April fools?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (3 children)

What women underwear would be large enough to have a pocket? Most are dinky small even if the wearer isn't.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Anyone else picturing Lara Croft, with the short shorts and form fitting t-shirts but huge holsters and garters?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Boy shorts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

My partner filled with umbrage,/ Enlightened me with a warning./ If she sees one on my visage,/ Shred the pockets would she, in the morning,/ With tiny scissors she has around the house./ I’ve placed an order, she does not know, the poor thing. / WE SHALL SEE how ends this game of cat and spouse./

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I own these, they're Fabletics, not Hanes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›