476
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 189 points 3 months ago

SWAT raid for Airpods seems like a misuse of public money. (among other things)

[-] ogmios 111 points 3 months ago

The SWAT team was looking for guns and other material related to a carjacking that had occurred that morning.

So it wasn't for the airpods themselves, but rather airpods being in the stolen car was how they attempted to find the carjackers. While the police definitely screwed up, the article author is going out of their way to create the most rage inducing headline possible.

[-] [email protected] 76 points 3 months ago

Eh...

The air pods did lead them to that street, then the cops just apparently picked a random house to raid.

So it's accurate, but it would have been best to add "following armed carjacking".

But the real issue is the overuse of raids and judges being way to fucking lenient with warrants.

Both things Biden claims he reigned in two years ago via executive order. I know because whenever I point out how not enough is done about our policing issues, people keep telling me everything is fine and Biden already fixed this and I should stop worrying about it.

Clearly it's still happening and people are being traumatized. Luckily this time the police didn't murder anyone at least.

But none of these cops or the judge who signed a bullshit warrant will ever be held accountable.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

It's not accurate, it uses nearby apple devices. If your iPhone picks up the air pods then it will point to an area where your iPhone is located. It can't pinpoint the exact location. This wasn't disclosed to the judge when the warrant was applied for. The police omitted critical information because they knew their warrant would be denied. Hopefully, a federal court will make things right, unfortunately, the police will keep their jobs.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

The author does not write the headlines.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Unfortunate for them that their name is right under the headline. Does the editor write the headline?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago
[-] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

Clickbait? These people had their home broken into and ransacked by a bunch of goons pointing rifles at them for absolutely no reason other than incompetence. They didn't even fix the damage they cause as noted at the end of the article.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 32 points 3 months ago

The majority of police departments are a misuse of public money. We need actual public safety and welfare.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

In Albuquerque 911 will tell you to find a station and put in a claim lol. These guys brought a whole team out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 88 points 3 months ago

He hopes in the course of the lawsuit to better understand how county police decide when to deploy a SWAT team.

“They probably have some kind of analytic multifactor test and they will fight tooth and nail to have that test not be exposed,” Schock says.

There's no shot the decision to send SWAT is anything other than if they feel like cosplaying that day.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago

Right, their analytical multifactor test is "Do I want to? Does my hunch say I should?".

[-] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

"Is there a donut shop on the way?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 66 points 3 months ago

They could just have... You know... Sent someone to have a look around the place. They'd probably just found the AirPods. Or... They could have... You know.... Acted like humans instead of paranoid power tripping psychos and -and I know this sounds crazy, but hear me out - rung the doorbell and asked questions like "have you seen anything?"

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] [email protected] 60 points 3 months ago

How is proximity to recovered stolen goods, found in a public area, enough to gain a warrant for a (no knock?) SWAT raid?

[-] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago

Not even recovered. Didn't they find them ditched into the street hours after tearing the house apart?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 49 points 3 months ago

Wauw. American cops are really scared of..everything aren’t they.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago

This family is lucky they didn't have an oak tree in their front yard or they'd have all been shot in self defense

[-] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

ONE GUY empties his clip into the back of his own squad car with a handcuffed suspect in it because of a falling acorn and now suddenly the whole force is getting an ear full... I'm sorry, but I thought this was America

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Thanks for the laugh, Randy.

[-] activ8r 2 points 3 months ago

I thought this was America

Yeah, that's why everyone is worried it's part of standard police training 😄

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 41 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

A fuckin SWAT raid for a damn pair of AirPods bruh ? What the fuck ? Like what in the actual fuck ? Can i get a swat in here because i lost one of my buds somewhere and maybe they can shoot up the cusions to find em ?

[-] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

Headline is slightly misleading, it was that a pair of carjackers stole a car that had AirPods within it so the police used the Find My location of those AirPods to therefore believe they could sent SWAT around to this lady's address.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Because it is difficult to call in whom lives at a home or see a car.

They picked a random house near the iPod location and assaulted it like a bunch of amateur goons. The headline is misleading, but the police are guilty of multiple crimes and should all be facing ACA charges. Every single one of them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Maybe you should actually read the article first before commenting.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago

Getting told to fuck off by the police, or having them send a swat team for you when your property is stolen.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago

The bipartisan police state everyone. We need to pass electoral reform so we can choose to be free.

Switching away from first past the post voting makes third parties viable and eliminates the spoiler effect. Just search for videos on FPTP voting if you want an explanation on how and why first past the post voting makes third parties not viable.

Electoral reform is possible in each individual state (for now), we dont need federal reform! Maine and Alaska have already passed electoral reform.

So what’s the hold up with the rest of the states? Consider starring a campaign to chanfe how we vote in your own state! Force our representatives to compete with fresh outside ideas. We deserve the best representation, not excuses.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

I don't believe voting reform alone will solve the two party problem, since we continue to have single-winner elections. We will need to push through voting reform and add-on some kind of proportional representation (my favorite is Sequential Proportional Approval Voting). Then we'll have a real chance for minor parties to have representation in office, instead of just at the bottom of the ballot box.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Ferguson MO sounds familiar.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Feel bad for the Shamily Family

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
476 points (97.2% liked)

Not The Onion

11114 readers
605 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS