this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
98 points (94.5% liked)

Canada

7241 readers
312 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The article heavily leans on Ontario and what doesn't work.

If anyone wondering how things are going for a province the adopted a payment system less focused on volume.

700 more family physicians in B.C. since payment revamp: doctors

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Right wing lunatics point out that BC has fared worse. Despite the evidence that you just shared.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't care about facts. I just want to fuck Trudeau!!!

/s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I mean, I get it. As a member of the follicly-challenged community, I too want to tussle his hair. I just wouldn’t put stickers on my vehicle. How gauche!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

Context: They are not unfair.

They are just not as outrageously and ridiculously high as say, American medical salaries, in the aggregate.

I mean, one is Socialised healthcare, the other is whatever private insurance madness Americans have. Where people can lose their home due to a broken leg, in fees. That is not really happening in Finland or Canada. Unless it is some extreme case.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

What about the taxes not paid on income through deductions? If the business is paying out 25-30% in legitimate expenses against the Doctor's income, it's a push. No-one has got anything near an increase to keep up with inflation over the past time span they reference - that's why Galen Weston is the poster-boy for corporate greed: HE makes more (as do the investor-class of land-owners and stock-players) while we plebes foot the bill.

Goddam, I'd like to get ahead, too, who wouldn't? But the implicit message here is "Pay me more or I'm gone." So CTV interviews one doctor who's uncertain she'll get sufficient ROI on her Canadian taxpayer subsidized education, who's facing making a median $250K a year and upset that after expenses and taxes, she won't have enough left to pay herself anything but "a pretty low rate".

How low? Well... $250K minus 30% expenses is $175K - and if they are legit deductions, her tax bill will be around $38500, leaving her $136500 as take home. That's $47.40 per hour.

Here's some free advice, buttercup, we're all in the same boat, we just don't all work in a profession that garners 6-month probationary writers to hear us whinge.

[–] Chonnawonga 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Why would you want to beat down someone else instead of demanding that everyone gets risen up?

Becoming a family doctor in Canada is a minimum 9-year (usually more) postsecondary education. That's life they're not getting back. And taxpayer-subsidized though it may be, most family doctors start their careers with six-figure student debt to pay off.

Being a family doctor is emotionally demanding, important to society, and increasingly complex. People can, and do, choose to make more money for less effort in other fields. It's no longer a promising career path for intelligent young people, which is leading to a shortage of people doing work we all depend on.

So OK, maybe you have no sympathy for them. But don't be surprised next time you need medical help and there's nobody there to help you.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This. People are all for unions and collective action until it inconveniences them or it is done by someone they seem "too rich."

We ARE all in the same boat. Doctors, with few exceptions, are still the working class who depend on their paychecks from their labor. That they are doing something about their conditions should be celebrated and modeled, not condemned.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Traditionally the middle class was doctors, lawyers, business people.

It kind of is again.

Doesn't mean were not still in the same boat though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Not a doctor, i spent 7 years on post secondary education and i barely raked in a 5 figure student debt to pay off at ultra low interest.

I had a friend studying to become a doctor. Because of that, banks allowed him to take on huge debts and he bought a brand new fully equipped wrangler. No wonder doctors have 6 figures debt if that's what banks allow them to take... I knew someone else in dentistry who bought a BMW.

Knowing that will make money, they take on more debt. Then they ask to raise salaries... It's a system that attracts greedy people, the type that will move out of their home country just to make now money.

For me, it would take about 4 times my current salary to move away, because all my family and friends are here.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The theory you describe is an endlessly increasing resource stream? Or is there a point where taxpayers run out of resources and the doctors, no longer getting what they want, withdraw their services? Does this sound like a rational and well thought out path forward?

[–] Chonnawonga 1 points 8 months ago

Not at all. What I would suggest is improving pay—but even more than that, working conditions—until family medicine work is not such a shitty proposition that medical students don't even want to go through the residency process to train for it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I certainly won’t work for $50/hr, and I didn’t spend nearly as much time or money on my education. You’re not really making the point you think you are.