this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
257 points (98.5% liked)

World News

31895 readers
457 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 57 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Sounds like the proper answer is to legalize the drugs, nationalize the cartel's, and call the US drug policy out for the farce it is.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 months ago

nationalize the cartels

Something tells me that the cartels wouldn't just let the government do this, and then you're right back to square one where the Mexican government is fighting against them.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago

nationalize the cartel

You and what army?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Mexico is pretty socially conservative, I think. I can't see that happening.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

They are, and normally I'd agree with you, but they just recently legalized abortion and that SHOCKED me. So who knows?! Mexico might do anything!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Technically, Mexico has had only two presidents from a right-wing party. Before, they were from the centrist party. The current president is a very well known leftist.

The country was bombarded with religion for centuries, so maybe you are thinking of that, but even so, the majority support a version of religion that mixes a "social concern for the poor and political liberation for oppressed peoples" with spirituality. It is similar to the recent declarations of Pope Francis about Marxists and Christians having a common goal It is called liberation theology.

Also, Mexico tried to legalize drugs back in 1940. It was promoted by a psychiatrist that informed the government that substance abuse was a mental disorder, which was very progressive for the era. Here is the story.

Of course, if you dig deeper, you'll know the United States basically coerced Mexico into criminalizing drugs again.

Around half the population still supports drug legalization, even after years of propaganda. The commenter below was shocked about abortion legalization. Abortion is legal in many places. Same-sex marriage is also legal, even in some more right-leaning states. A couple years ago, a transgender clinic with free care was opened in Mexico City. Similarly, free healthcare and many other welfare initiatives such as free education (including universities) are common and not negotiable for the average Mexican.

So, yeah, I guess you'll find homophobic old people, religious nuts, or lately, U.S.-influenced right-wing supporters, but Mexico is overall progressive as I see it. Even historically:

Slave abolition was one of the first things Mexico did as an independent country, around 1810-1817. The first black president in 1829. Safe place for U.S. slaves to escape and live as free people during the 19th century. First native (indigenous) president in 1858. The Constitution has been protecting native populations' rights since 1917. During the 20th century, there were big movements in favor of socialism (e.g., agrarian socialists called zapatistas, or students' movements in the National Autonomous University of Mexico). The list goes on... The first woman president is probably happening this year.

I hope this puts things into perspective, and sorry for infodumping!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The reason fentanyl is so prevalent is because it's easy to smuggle. The reason it's so deadly is it's hard to accurately dose. Legalization immediately solves both of those problems.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

How many bus full of Mexicans must get slaughtered before he will fight them on behalf of Mexicans?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It really seems like he has been fighting them, at least significantly more than previous presidents

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

How is this “fight” being represented? I ask, because in more than one occasion he’s been seen being close to El Chapo’s mother, do you mean he’s “fighting” cartels by negotiating with them? Or does this fight mean rather things like shouting “more hugs, less shootings”, or his menacing “I’ll tell on you to your mothers!” to the cartels?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago

In June 2023, he said of one drug gang that had abducted 14 police officers: “I’m going to tell on you to your fathers and grandfathers,” suggesting they should get a good spanking.

Didn't expect to read that in an AP article.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If there's a better policy that helps Mexico as a whole which isn't what the US wants, I'd love to hear it. Something tells me "not fighting drug cartels" isn't it.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Legalising and taxing all drugs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That wouldn’t help

The problem isn’t drug use in Mexico, the problem is drugs going to the US

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes to the first part but what do you think would happen to the American drug market if they did that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I don’t forsee mass immigration of Americans to Mexico

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Neither do I. I'm not sure of your point?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That legalization of drugs in Mexico isn’t going to get rid of cartels

That is very obvious in my first comment where I say it won’t help

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Okay but you are aware that you just declared it wouldn't help, despite evidence to the contrary right?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/14/legal-marijuana-medical-use-crime-rate-plummets-us-study

https://www.sandiego.edu/news/detail.php?_focus=84160

It cuts into their profits given them less clout and less reason to kill each other. As such, it will help, as can be seen with the example of weed.

Edit: in fact, the only reason drugs remain illegal at all is because some very wealth and powerful people make too much money from it remaining so. Well, that and so the CIA can fund illegal wars around the world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You are aware that your articles talk about American legalization and are irrelevant to the topic at hand because the Mexican president doesn’t not hold jurisdiction over the US

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Of course I'm aware.

Wait, are you trying to tell me you think it wouldn't translate into helping, if they did it on the other side of the boarder too? I have to check because that's pretty wild.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We are only talking about Mexico here

Mexico having a policy of legalizing all drugs isn’t going to stop the violence because the violence comes from people selling to the US. No cartel is worried they are going to get arrested in Mexico for having these substances

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, yes we are talking about Mexico. Any hit to the cartels profits, be it in America or Mexico, is going to help battle the cartels, even if you don't want to beleive it and even if you declare it not to be true.

You see, they actually sell drugs in Mexico too. Itll also bring down the price of drugs in the US, as the market will be flooded. Its really not hard. You just don't like it and that's not the same thing as it not helping.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Be my guest to prove me wrong then

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I already did. You just didn't like it and, again, declared it wouldn't work without a hint of evidence or even any argumentation.

I don't need a magic bullet to disprove "nothing will help." Youre just failing to realise how poor a declaration it was.

Also, I never needed to prove you wrong in the first place. You never proved yourself right. You just declared it to be thus and such.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You seem to be circling, this is frivolous

I could repeat what I already said about your proof but then you will just say it again

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There will still be people to sell to in the US

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Thats literally the point I'm making. I don't get what you don't get here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Adding to your comment, I think they should have different percentages of taxing as well. For example heroin should be taxed way higher than cannabis.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Mexico should build a wall and get the US to pay for it and Make Mexico Great Again.

Oh, wait....

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Operation Reciprocity when?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

LOL, I feel that one. That novel is where I learned the word.

load more comments
view more: next ›