this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
60 points (66.1% liked)

politics

18651 readers
4158 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 94 points 5 months ago (19 children)

All it takes is enough people choosing not to participate in a clearly two-party system , and we have Trump for 20 more years.

Go ahead, do your protest vote. Vote your conscience. Whatever you call it.

Yeah, we need a better voting system… but we don’t have one at the moment.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 5 months ago (12 children)

Ranked choice voting FIRST, then you can do your protest vote.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 5 months ago

Exactly. Get rid of this ridiculous electoral college and make every vote count.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I don't think you're wrong per se, but maybe, maybe, a political party should have to serve its voters' interests to get them to vote it, instead of relying on the other guy being a ghoul to gather fear-votes and blackmail-votes from those it ignores.

Not an American, but given similar experiences in my country (Greece), I absolutely do not blame them.

Our right wing politician just got the most popular re-election and standalone election statistics, and the only reelection-higher-than-first-election numbers, in our country's political history.

And everyone hates him.

I'm going to over-over-simplify, but the reason for those numbers, is that our left has failed at serving the rights and interests of the people, and then has been cannibalising itself, getting corrupted, and losing members for at least 15 years.

If a system is so corrupt that it doesn't take care of its citizens, they're naturally going to stop caring and supporting it. The ghouls will take over, because ghouls thrive in corruption better. 100%-Hitler will win, when his only opponent is 75%-Hitler, because 100%-Hitler is actually liked by some part of the populace.

This kind of fattening-of-the-ruling-class has been the way almost every single empire has weakened itself into collapsing over time, in human history.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

We need to trim the fat, so to speak. But that takes revolution, and—Americans—can’t agree on where the fat is.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

I’m going to over-over-simplify, but the reason for those numbers, is that our left has failed at serving the rights and interests of the people, and then has been cannibalising itself, getting corrupted, and losing members for at least 15 years.

Yet another country where this sort of thing happened: A feckless, corrupt, out-of-touch left loses to a douchebag on the right that everyone hates. It happened in the US, it happened in Argentina, and it keeps on happening in Britain, and I'm sure there's a bunch of other countries I'm forgetting.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 80 points 5 months ago (4 children)

This article was written by Jeff Charles. A podcaster and political contributor who has appeared on fox News and Newsmax. He's also anti sensible gun control, transphobic and believes being trans is just ignoring biology, believes that schools should ban books that have "ideology" in them (anything queer), thinks kids are being indoctrinated just because it occasionally comes up that there are different ways of being a person, says he's an anarchist but will say libertarian sometimes to avoid "making people think he's crazy" but just doing that shows that he doesn't actually understand what anarchism is (or how crazy some libertarians are), and also talks about how the left wants Americans to be dependent on the state (all social programs). He's also on point for some things, specifically things that most libertarians ascribe to, like fuck cops and anti drug war. But like most libertarians, he only believes in his "do whatever you want and leave me alone" mentality when it lines up with his personal beliefs.

I don't disagree that there are black voters who are frustrated with the dems, but this is not a very good article and is written by an ass who has to push the idea so he can continue to be brought onto Fox News and Newsmax to talk about it and so his site gets new subscribers. Subscribers that have to pay 50 bucks a year for his premium content. Which I'm honestly surprised doesn't cost more. He's also partnered with Doni Anthony who has his own site/substack, which when you're on the landing page, the second article is, well, it requires subscribing and I'm not gonna do that. But it's about a bill called the Inclusive Democracy Act of 2023 which is about restoring voting rights to people with criminal records/felonies who have done their time, the article is about the "hidden" reason the democrats support the bill, which is a far right conspiracy that average voters would never vote for a democrat so they have to make new voters to be able to win. It's all baseless conspiracy stuff and is the same thought process for the "illegal immigrants voting" conspiracy.

The point is that an article is only as reliable as the author is, and this author is just crap.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 months ago (17 children)

The poster of this article is almost certainly some kind of troll. If not a Russian agent, a fascism sympathizer. If you look at his posting history, it is almost entirely about attacking the Democratic party and Biden. Even when he is "pro-progressivism" it is usually in the form of a concern troll.

As a result, everyone should ignore return2ozma. And it's probably time to block him entirely. Also, report him for being a troll, since he breaks the rules on a regular basis.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

If not a Russian agent, a fascism sympathizer.

Even when he is "pro-progressivism" it is usually in the form of a concern troll.

I have observed the same pattern with other users who are pro-Trump and pro-Russia. They would claim to profess an ideology and say they don't support Russia and Trump, but then put their heads into the sand and pretend Trump and Russia did not do anything wrong.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah. He's the second "both candidates suck" account I'm having to block. Seems like posting to generate voter apathy which helps Trump.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago

Saying "both sides are equally bad" is a common tactic for those who want the bad side to win.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 months ago (18 children)

I work in construction, and there are several black co-workers of mine that support Trump.

Idk why it is so hard for media to grasp that there are chuds of every race.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It is not unusual for decent workers, outnumbered by right wingers, to go-along-to-get-along to keep their asses out of unneeded troubles.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Nah dude. Plenty of non-white workers saying bigoted shit all the time.

People need to stop attributing morality to skin color

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Construction is just a circle jerk of vocal trump supporters and people too concerned about being astrocized by their coworkers to speak up. Right ring identity is peer pressured onto people that don't pay any attention to politics. It's all just jokes and games to these idiots

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Fans of misogyny work in construction? 😱

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Democratic Party has been gradually losing support among racial minority voters over recent years, a trend that has garnered no small level of attention in the political sphere.

Several other polls have confirmed that this paradigm shift remains in full swing as nonwhites gradually veer away from the party they called home.

Yet while the GOP will undoubtedly pick up a higher percentage than it has in the past, that doesn't mean that an exodus to the Party of Lincoln is in the offing—especially when it concerns Black Americans.

In February, folks like Turning Point USA's Charlie Kirk and other prominent Right-leaning figures decided it would be a good idea to attack Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and the 1964 Civil Rights Act during Black History Month.

Entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy also came under fire for employing rhetoric about the Black community that was reliant on stereotypes and almost wholly devoid of solutions.

While more Black folks are seeing that the Democrats have no intention of doing anything meaningful to give African Americans a fairer shot, it is not as if they have a home with the GOP.


The original article contains 673 words, the summary contains 188 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›