this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
169 points (98.8% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3517 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The House speaker is open to a stand-alone vote on Ukraine aid. Marjorie Taylor Greene isn’t going to like that one bit.

Poor Mike Johnson is in quite a bind. The House speaker simply doesn’t have a governing majority: It is borderline impossible to pass anything with only Republican votes, because the hard-right MAGA bloc wants to thwart governing at all costs. So he needs Democrats to pass anything that wouldn’t be uniformly awful for the country. Yet if he does rely on Democrats, that MAGA faction is prepared to depose him.

That’s why Johnson’s new indication that he’s considering holding a vote on a Ukraine aid package—one that would be separate from an Israel aid bill—is so intriguing and suggestive. 

“I think it is a stand-alone, and I suspect it will need to be on suspension,” Johnson told Politico, meaning that a bill funding Ukraine aid would have to move via a fast-track procedure that prevents insurgents from bottling up bills in committees.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 68 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

You have to be extremely naive to believe that, Johnson is still trying to block and delay anything that help Ukraine.

Johnson is a traitor and will lie with a straight face to help Trump help Putin.
He is trying to make an agreement among republicans that will fail in the senate. To avoid the Bill from the Senate he is blocking the vote on to pass when the discharge forces a vote on it.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 months ago

And he's just killing time. If they passed the current aid bill, Ukrainians would start getting weapons again in a week.

If he writes new bills, votes on those now, etc etc etc, he can buy Putin another month of Ukraine being weakened.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I don't know if voting for Ukraine aid is really sticking a shiv in MAGA. But they are such thin-skinned babies that I'm sure they will think so.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Oh no, he's going to rile up the snowflakes!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

MAGA is a Putin creation of course they'll be upset

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Poor Mike Johnson …

I thought we didn’t know anything about his finances because he never submitted supposedly required paperwork upon getting elected. (I’m playing on words here but my point stands)

You made your bed chucklefuck Mike, now lay in it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

He's so poor he doesn't even have a bank account! And I guess share a pornhub account with his son.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

One wonders, with such a slim majority, where the speaker and a few others would swing the majority, if they've realised they could negotiate bi-partisan agreements which would push conservative policies at the cost of some democratic ones. It would crush the magas, while still pushing conservative agendas and get som form of government working again.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

The trouble is, there doesn't appear to be even a few Republicans left who want that.