Isn't there still a hill to climb even if they get subscriber details in proving the person who is the subscriber for that line had anything to do with any "infringement" that may of occurred. I thought speculative invoicing of subscribers had gone out of fashion as a piracy deterrent?
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
33 points (90.2% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
54390 readers
249 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Spanish here. This is not accurate and the media is selling the message that La Liga wants.
The sentence allows La Liga to get the data of the streamer, the person who share the signal illegally to make a profit, not the IPTV's viewers, and even in that case there are some possible issues. That is a totally different thing.
Here there is a Twitter thread of a Spanish's lawyer which is an expert in this matter: https://twitter.com/davidmaeztu/status/1766025574449844405?s=19