756
255.255.255.256 (lemmy.sdf.org)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 121 points 4 months ago

I wish someone would try that pickup line on me. All I get is "are you an IPv4 address? You look like you've been shared around between a few hundred households" :(

[-] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago

Face the reality.

[-] [email protected] 67 points 4 months ago

That pickup line has a TTL of zero.

[-] [email protected] 40 points 4 months ago

192.168.1.0/24 = caffeine

10.0.0.0/8 = cocaine

[-] [email protected] 31 points 4 months ago

I use 10.69.4.20 as my gateway adress and you cant do anything about it

[-] [email protected] 34 points 4 months ago
iptables -A OUTPUT -s 10.69.4.20 -j DROP
[-] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

Oh I can be mad about it >:(

Seriously gateways should be first or last address in the space. Fight me!

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Lol an apt description

[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Brewing your coffee with red bull instead of water

[-] [email protected] 38 points 4 months ago

"32 bit is ought to be enough for everybody"

-- ipv4 inventors probably

[-] [email protected] 34 points 4 months ago

"DNS never breaks. Nobody will ever have to type in an IP address"

  • ipv6 inventors probably
[-] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

The never ending network problems keep sysadmins happily employed. AI can't replace them yet because they need internet connection to work.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago

If I remember right, that is almost exactly what they thought. Or rather he. I think it was one guy. The one who wrote the RFC. And no-one called him on it because at the time, that did not seem unreasonable.

4.3 billion devices that all need their own unique address? It's not like everyone on Earth will need one.

What then followed was allocations of giant swaths of IPv4 addresses to large organisations, compounded by the fact that similarly large swaths were already reserved for special uses, leaving the whole thing with a problem basically from the outset.

I believe that one guy has said that he wishes he'd made it 64 bit and even thought about it at the time. But the "save every byte" mindset of the pre-Internet era was still very much alive and well, and I think that's why he went for the smaller option.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago

Is being exhausted a complement somehow?

[-] [email protected] 37 points 4 months ago

No the joke is that this is that sassy but supporting friend saying it. It's a reality check and an opportunity to ask for help from the friend saying it.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Isn't like only 80 some percent of IPv4s actually used?

[-] [email protected] 37 points 4 months ago

It's all allocated, but not all those allocations are for routing on the internet. Eg private ranges, localhost space, multicast, experimental ranges. Unfortunately you can't repurpose those ranges as there is already kit out there that is hard coded to treat them a particular way.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

also why the fuck are there 16581375 addresses that just loopback to your own computer???
reserving just 127.0.0.0/24 or even just 127.0.0.1 would've been more than enough, but nooo we're gonna ~~give you~~ waste a whole /8 block

[-] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

why’s Apple have the entire 17 area code

[-] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Now that ipv4 address price reached $60 a pop, those represent a whopping $60 x 16777216 = $1,006,632,960.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Because address classes. Stupid decision by stupid people.

this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
756 points (99.2% liked)

linuxmemes

19849 readers
491 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS