this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
124 points (98.4% liked)

politics

18828 readers
6042 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So, my thought here is that I really feel like this should be leading the effort to get Joe Biden returned to office in 2025. This shit really does scare me -- how efficiently the GOP has planned to do this shit, and how abjectly bad the Democrats are at bringing this up. Maybe it's because I'm not a political campaign runner and there's something I'm missing, but man, it feels like this would be IMPORTANT to get in front of the voters? What are your guyses' thoughts on this topic?

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Accountable.US is launching ads targeting a coalition of conservative organizations over their support of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and abortion restrictions.

The ads are slated to go on Google and Meta and will run for about a week, according to a source familiar with the matter.

Related policy papers have argued for bringing back the Comstock Act, which would restrict sending abortion pills by mail.

“From plotting to enact conservatives’ most restrictive anti-abortion agenda to date to scheming to turn U.S. troops on protestors, Project 2025 is an existential threat to our fundamental rights and freedoms on every level.”

IVF rose to the national spotlight last month after Alabama’s state Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos are considered children.

Kay Ivey (R) signed a bill Wednesday shielding IVF providers from lawsuits or criminal charges over the “death or damage to an embryo” during the process.


The original article contains 309 words, the summary contains 145 words. Saved 53%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!