this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
80 points (75.6% liked)

Linux

46794 readers
1250 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Today i was doing the daily ritual of looking at distrowatch. Todays reveiw section was about a termal called warp, it has built in AI for recomendations and correction for commands (like zhs and nushell). You can also as a chatbot for help. I think its a neat conscept however the security is what makes me a bit skittish. They say the dont collect data and you can check it aswell as opt out. But the idea of a terminal being read by an Ai makes me hesitant aswell as a account needed to use warp. What do you guys think?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

I'm not the biggest fan of the forced account thing, but I do like a lot of Warp's features. The command suggestions especially make dealing with tools that have like 1000 switches so much easier (like docker for example). Other than that... It's easy to customize, fast and looks good.

Tl;Dr: I like Warp, cry about it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Command suggestions can be provided by the shell too for what it’s worth. fish ships with autosuggestion and autocompletion. For zsh, you need a separate plugin (but it’s well worth it)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I use fish and have used it for a long time and it works very well with warp, actually. You get both it's autosuggestions and warp's autocomplete. 's nice

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Fair enough

[–] Steamymoomilk 3 points 5 months ago

Its not that i hate the idea of having an AI in the terminal its just the idea of having a account to use it. I played around with it last night and tried diffrent ideas which it sometimes is useful. I did #what is my graphics card "Lspci -k "VGA"" Ok that was helpful Then i tried #what driver is my graphics card using? "Lspci -k "VGA"" Which does not list your driver. Its hit or miss.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

I don't know what AI could bring to the table in this case that you can't do without it already. Command completions or fixing typos works without using AI. If there was an actual benefit, I'd be open to try it out but only by using an open source LLM running locally. I'm definitely not creating an account and paying a monthly subscription while not even being able to use it offline.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

tldr, fzf-tab suffices for me. For anything else you may give shellgpt a try. But I love my Alacritty with a zsh and p10k.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is faily easy to build using offline models. Only problem is GPU whirring away running typically light terminal commands.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Helping with complex Terminal commands/shell scripts is basically my #1 practical use-case for AI right now... especially if you use tools like JQ a lot. Saving keystrokes is a lifestyle, after all.

I am also a really big fan of Warp, and was even before they added the AI feature (the editor-style functionality is wonderful). For the record, the AI isn't always running in Warp, to use it you start a prompt with hash (#) and then ask for what you want and it presents options.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

simply use thefuck

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Terminal with GUI drop down menus every time you try and type something seems like the kind of Terminal a microsoft executive would dream up

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Don't need it, don't want it. They can fuck off with this nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

optional autocomplete is a nice-to-have, eager autocomplete is a pain in the ass. as long as it only completes when I ask it to, I don't mind.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

If I have to use a cloud service or create an account to use the terminal, it’s a no for me dawg.

Did warp ever follow through with allowing folks to use it without signing into your GitHub account?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

To me this is complete nonsense


but they (warp) seem to be funding fzf ... which is good on their part, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

As long as AI is not being forced into the existing terminal standards, it's good, as you can just choose to not use a terminal with AI.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I really enjoy Warp. It’s sleek and modern, plus it saves me a lot of time with its advanced autofill features. It also gives me helpful suggestions for minor edits if I’m making small errors that keep a command from running.

I haven’t used the chatbot, but I have found the user experience of the program to be better than most other terminals I’ve used before.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm in the same boat. Best terminal app I've used in a long while. Not using AI features

[–] priapus 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

the non AI features of warp, such as the modern editing and easy function creation, are more interesting to me than the AI features. I wish there was an open source terminal that felt this modern.

I have used AI to generate commands many times, but not often enough that I need it built into my terminal. I prefer my default terminal experience be more minimal.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm likely going to try out Wave Terminal with a self hosted LLM. I think it may well be quite useful, just don't want to upload my entire command history to OpenAI.

[–] Steamymoomilk 3 points 5 months ago

Let me know if you get that working! That would be super cool.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

I feel like every use case they showcase is useless if you remember the commands. And if you don't know a command, the classic googling until you find something that works usually does the trick.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Just use Ollama.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

The AI can have access to a terminal in a docker container on my raspberry pi. If I’m convinced it’s trustworthy it might move up to a docker container on my desktop.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I'll just use ChatGPT standalone, lol. Or cheat.sh.

[–] IamRoot 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Steamymoomilk 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I think it could be a good entry point for people learning the linux terminal. IE windows to linux, However i refuse the idea of having an account and it running on another trust me bro computer. I also think the account idea is rather stupid and a privacy consern.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Fish's autocomplete is enough for me. I do like having Copilot in my editor but I can't really think of a reason I'd need it in my terminal. Most of my time in the terminal is just installing things, git or moving things around and I have all those commands down as muscle memory.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›