Ubuntu Core Desktop Delayed, Won't Be Released in April (www.omgubuntu.co.uk)

submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Ubuntu Core Desktop will not be released alongside Ubuntu 24.04 LTS in April, as originally hoped.

Canonical doesn’t go into details about what specific issues need resolving. One imagines, given that the first Ubuntu Core Desktop release was going to be a preview and not a recommended download, it’s a myriad bugs/difficulties — ones not easily sorted.

all 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] [email protected] 49 points 5 months ago

"Canonical announced it was building an all-snap, immutable version of Ubuntu for home users called Ubuntu Core Desktop."

I don't like the sound of this.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

I can only imagine what a call to 'mount' is going to look like.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

There might be a delay

[-] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

Sounds exactly like the Snap version of Fedora Silverblue. Which is actually pretty great.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago

If only snap packages weren't utter garbage and the authors actually tested them before pushing them out.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

“Test it in production.”

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Ah yes, the Microsoft way.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Yeah, it sounds like the desktop version of an Iphone.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

I don't believe iOS and Android use immutable filesystems to the extent some Linux distros do, like openSuse Aeon, Fedora Silverblue, Nixos, etc. iOS and Android just make it more difficult to gain root access.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

They do. By default the system partition is straight up mounted read-only.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Can someone suggest a community for linux noob like me? Installed U-Mate yesterday. I may need an active community specifically created for new users.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

This community is full of noobs, feel free to post your questions.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

The only reason I'm still using Canonical's bullshit after they tried to kill Unity, tried to force Snap on me and put ads in the shell is because of Rudra Saraswat. His Ubuntu Unity flavor is really good once you remove snapd.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I guess I have a little while longer to migrate all my servers to a new OS.

Edit: oh this is for home users. Well, it’s only a matter of time before this is rolled out to Ubuntu Server.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Fuck Canonical anyway.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago

Canonical still does more for the Linux desktop than most of us ever have or ever will

[-] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

Agreed.

Neverless, fuck Canonical.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

[removed by mod]

[-] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I do. I send in bug reports when I run into one, and try to provide details and context appropriate to the problem. I don't know how to code, so that's about as much as I can do.

Just because Canonical has done something right doesn't mean they are immune to blame for doing something wrong, and they have done some shit.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

[removed by mod]

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Yes, I believe I did acknowledge that. Doesn't mean they're immune to blame for shit they did wrong.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

[removed by mod]

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Increasing analytics over time, that bullshit decision around 2015/6 to give an option to connect all your accounts to your canonical account, and yes snap. And no it's not superior because although the frontend is open-source, the backend is still proprietary; that one fact alone is not a dealbreaker necessarily, but it is problematic and I don't like it.

Now, if the backend were to be made open-source, I would absolutely no problem with snap. I think it is otherwise is a great solution to the problem of fragmentation in the Linux community. But as it is, its increasing adoption is concerning. Closed-source stuff is the antithesis of the foss movement, and the longer it is proprietary the more easily it will be that ill-meaning companies are able to infect the foss landscape with their poison.

You see it as a solution; I see it as a risk.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Now you've borned so much executable type. Why can't you release the source code of the software to "make sure there isn't malware" and pledge and unveil it.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

It was nice while it lasted. Moved to MX.

this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024

85 points (96.7% liked)

Linux

45773 readers

776 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]