615
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The White House and Democratic members of Congress called Georgia Republican’s comparison a ‘compliment’

(page 2) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It drives me nuts how so many people just claim FDR was any kind of socialist. FDR was the best capitalist the system ever made, he was responsible for saving capitalism in America and making it a bulwark against the waves of facsim and socialism that was sweeping the world.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Honestly, does he even need campaigning? Like since when did you read a political ad or billboard and was like "hmm my mind has officially changed". Most of people's mind has already been made up. He could really sit there and not do anything and end up winning.

Edit: yeah. We need every fighting chance we get. Release the dark brandon memes.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

This is delicious

[-] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

Lmao be nice if literally any of that was fucking true.

[-] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago

I have to wonder if she’s trolling Democrats to get more exposure.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
615 points (98.6% liked)

politics

18138 readers
3973 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS