this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
158 points (88.3% liked)

Privacy

30856 readers
517 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have this old TP-Link smart lightbulb, it’s the only thing that’s IoT and on WiFi in my house.

Looking through pfBlocker logs for fun, and noticed it’s been trying to connect to the Tor network.

Oh! Also, it’s been uploading and downloading 100+ MB of data a day.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 107 points 7 months ago (3 children)

It's just an NTP pool. The device is trying to update it's time. Likely it made many other requests to other servers when this one didn't work.

Maintaining up to date lists of anything is a game of whack a mole, so you're always going to get weird results.

If you're actually unsure, pcap the traffic on your pfsense box and see for yourself. NTP is an unencrypted protocol, so tshark or Wireshark will have no problem telling you all about it.

That said, I'd still agree with the other poster about local integration with home assistant and just block that sucker from the Internet.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Agreed. To add to this because the traffic is being blocked it keeps retrying so it's inflating the traffic size. I have about 14 tplink WiFi switches on a vlan and my pfsense rule for NTP is less than 6 megabytes. OP is conflating legitimate NTP traffic with Tor.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Similar to forwarding all DNS traffic to my pihole, I also forward 123 to the opnsense NTP server.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

NTP is an unencrypted protocol, so tshark or Wireshark will have no problem telling you all about it.

Wait, it is? Pretty sure chrony.conf has some auth stuff in it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Authentication != Encryption

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's definitely been popped. Rip.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You're the one that connected an impossible-to-security-update device to the internet. You can do plenty of home automation without it needing to be that way, if you're open to a little more setup being involved in the process.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (3 children)

It's on it's own VLAN from the beginning. Wanted to poke around but never got to it.

I still have it connected, want to use for practice.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I hope you update the post with any info you find.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Will do. It's part of a long list.

Don't know my ADHD will hyper focus on it tho haha

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Good on you. I use the poor man's VLAN--guest Wi-Fi network to isolate my IoT devices.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I have no idea of all the details, but in legal terms this is called "res ipsa loquitur" -- in this case, the fact that it clearly seems compromised is pretty solid evidence that it wasn't immune to compromise.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Expected since TP-Link stopped updating them shortly after release.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Your house heard about the dark web and thought it needed some light.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

TP-Link is trash. Avoid at all costs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I went to ask nicely for help from their support department and got a development build for one of their routers. Not only was it an ancient version of OpenWRT with the myriad of unpatched vulnerabilities, but it had absolutely dumb/weird configurations like the Wi-Fi password being a user account password exposed to a patched up SSH daemon with shell /bin/false. Just a whole lot of why and an obvious lack of care put into the software.

Their devices function... Most of the time. That's about all that's redeeming.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

That's really odd. For what it's worth though, the company I work for does firmware updates over a Tor hidden service for customer privacy. We don't send any data though (as that would defeat the purpose entirely), just poll for updates then download and install if there are any.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Fwiw the TP link bulbs usually have a local API that Home Assistant has an integration for. You can use that and block their internet access - unless they've removed that feature. I only used one of these briefly because someone gave it to me. Usually just use cheap ZigBee bulbs. I would throw that one out though as someone else said it's likely been compromised already...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm all in on ZigBee and z-wave. The bulb is isolated, don't even know my app login.

Do you mind sharing what ZigBee lightbulbs you recommend?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The zigbee bulbs I've had the best luck with are Innr, although they are kind of pricy. Ikea bulbs are good for the price, but every one I have, has very loud coil whine when off. I had some on bedside stands and had to move them to other rooms. Sengled are nice when they work, I've had issues with them dropping off my network.

Both Ikea and Innr are also repeaters, Sengled does not do repeaters in their bulbs. Neither Ikea or Innr are exactly cheap, but they've been the most solid for me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Thats why my Smart Home is build on Zigbee. (Yeah VLANs and so on, but so many clients still makes your wifi worse)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm installing a new Wi-Fi setup soon and I will be putting all of my iot devices on an iot network that is segmented from my main wifi.

I will also be jailbreaking them from tuya and running a local home assistant.

Bit of a hassle but it's a fun experiment to get my "smart" home set up just for me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The thing is it still impacts the other Wifi Channels and Networks (or at least those on the same band, guessing mist IoT uses 2.4GHz) even tho other Channels are used.

But, i see the appeal, since most smart home devices you can get cheap are Wifi connected. Hope that changes with the ESP32-H2 and -C6. Those are relatively recently released.

Wifi is just such a heavy proticol for just sending sensor data and some commands around, imho.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

It doesn't affect it that much. It's very easy to separate out the bands and to put your iot devices far away from your regular Internet devices.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago