this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
23 points (89.7% liked)

Australia

3480 readers
75 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

You know how people make jokes about Thatcher and Regan's graves being gender neutral bathrooms?

Who do you think qualifies, or will qualify, for that title here in Australia?

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

George Pell, until Howard croaks anyway.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He was a strong contender in my mind as well but he's probably not buried here. I haven't done the research to know for sure.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He's buried in St. Mary's Cathedral's crypt, in Sydney.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Perfect. It would be easy for them to erect signs there as well.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Rupert qualifies as #1 if he is buried here or if any monuments are raised.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm of the opinion that if you're not an Australian, you shouldn't qualify for this title, regardless of where you get burried.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Was he not born here? He started out in Adelaide so I thought he was Australian enough. Chances are he won't be buried here though.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He literally made the choice to renounce his Australian citizenship. In my mind, that makes him less Australian than some random person who happens to have been born non-Australian and stayed that way.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You are correct and he did do this - but it was purely a move to allow him to own broadcast rights in the USA. He needed US citizen to do that, and it didn't really affect him in any other way, so he did it. He still maintained a base in Australia (as well as UK and USA) for the rest of his life.

Is he still disqualified?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He cared more about getting broadcast rights in the USA than being an Australian. Yes, he's absolutely disqualified IMO.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'd still piss on his grave tho, but not if he was on fire.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

He's another strong contender. People can use his office in whatever his next gig is

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Ta for that link.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

My vote goes to Sir John Kerr.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

He would be a strong contender. On a related note I thought Menzies would be appropriate. Not because he was overly horrible, but because everytime conservatives want name some new think tank or something they name it after him.

[–] Aurenkin 2 points 7 months ago

The CIA wants to know your location