this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
65 points (97.1% liked)

Xbox

5303 readers
1 users here now

An Xbox community for Lemmy!


UNIVERSAL XBOX SUBSCRIBE LINK - CLICK HERE

Click this to open this community in your Specific Instance, then click Subscribe


Rules:


QUICK START GUIDE AND RULES:

New to Lemmy?

View the Getting Started Guide

Community Finder


Attributions:

Xbox Logo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:XBOX_logo_2012.svg

Banner : https://www.xbox.com/en-us/wallpapers/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

"won't be using AI to replace developers"

"We think that AI is something that can help improve certain process in game production, but not replace people"

You can't use AI without replacing people in some aspect. If a developer is using AI to do the job of two people, that second person doesn't get hired. I'm not mad, it's just the way things are going to be now but anyone who says they aren't replacing people with AI is just looking for some good PR. Everything will use AI going forward the toothpaste is out of the tube.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If a developer is using AI to do the job of two people, that second person doesn’t get hired.

Or you have two much more productive developers... Not as black and white as you make it seem.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Or even just the same developer, but working less hours. Less likely, but possible.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

20 years ago I worked for a grocery company that introduced self checkout terminals. Corporate messaging was that no jobs would be lost. They now run 6 self checkouts in most stores with a single clerk managing them.

It may be true that they didn’t directly let anyone go, but even if they just let attrition do the job, those positions are gone and never coming back.