this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
103 points (100.0% liked)

Games

31430 readers
1065 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Annoying. Don't let the industry autoregulate, it's always lukewarm and ineffective.
Legislate. Ban underage gambling.
This is not a complicated issue, at all, the only barriers are lobbying and corruption.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. Time and time again researchers have found that lootboxes have the same psychological effects as gambling, which should be enough justification for regulating it as such. Publishers try to excuse it by the technicality that people can't (directly) win real money from it, glossing over how they lose real money every time. It's all the negative effects, with only the possibility of a fictional reward for it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or the unsettling alternative: "are you 18?" "Yes" "Prove it"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Didn't the UK govt already try that with a gaming ID that went nowhere?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

US states are already testing that option with disastrous results.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, is this just for kids? That's the worst option since it means checking and privacy invasion.

I'd rather they just flat out ban them. Loot boxes never make anything better.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Pretty much, I didn't see much in the way of actual solutions in the article.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The first is a commitment to make available technological controls to effectively restrict anyone under 18 from acquiring a loot box without the consent or knowledge of a parent or guardian. Many of these controls are already available on games platforms but aren't as widely used as they could be. The new principles set out best-practice for their use in an effort to increase take-up.

The second is to drive awareness of those controls with a public information campaign. An expert panel will be set up to share best practices on age assurance issues.

This is pretty pathetic and limp. They need to take a stronger stance on this than just get parent/guardian agreement - we already know how this will go and that circumvention is just going to be lying about age.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I saw a pathetic statement from that woman in the news the other day - "we can trust the games industry to regulate itself blah blah"... Can we fuck. Typical free market Tory politician.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Great news!

load more comments
view more: next ›