this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
427 points (96.9% liked)

People Twitter

4937 readers
1915 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 35 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I mean, I see your point, but a shop here sells spaghetti in what's practically a paper envelope and that just feels like the right way to package spaghetti, on so many levels.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

I don't see how that can't be improved by a window. We can do it for real envelopes after all, so that the letters can look out at the world.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Now I'm wondering how susceptible pasta is to going bad faster when exposed to light... Are we paying more for worse pasta because of marketing!?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Pasta was traditionally dried under sunlight, so I'd expect that to just not really be a thing...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Huh. How about that...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think that's even better than the flimsy plastic packaging that tears just by holding it wrong and you get noodles scattered all over the floor.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Oh yeah, it is rather robust paper in this case. You could probably even dip it into water for a moment, without getting the spaghet wet.

Our plastic wrappings are rather robust, too, though, as most things are sold without the complementary cartons...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Everything here except the one expensive brand is just full plastic packaging. The one expensive brand used to have the window, but now removed it for environmental reasons.

When I realizes this I decided to switch to the more expensive brand, even if I'm very much paying for brand name, in the end it doesn't matter to me if a pack of spaghetti costs 89 cents or 2.09€ (even if it's like half my diet), but especially given the problems of microplastic I can't justify buying plastic packaged noodles.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You mean the addition of single-use plastic to packaging that doesn't need it?

[–] threelonmusketeers 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Aren't those windows often cellophane, not plastic?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Not that I'm aware of

(Warning: greenwashing link) https://www.barilla.com/en-gb/box

This company states that they used to use plastic in their packaging, so I'd imagine with other brands, it's common as well.

Cellophane by itself does not prevent water vapor from entering the packaging unless coated with highly flammable material, so not sure how much companies use that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No ethical consumption etc

[–] [email protected] 31 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Disagree, you have to remove that window to recycle the rest of the packaging. I specifically look for the ones with no window if possible

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Is that less work than taking it out for recycling though?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm willing to find common ground with the capitalists if they're willing to concur that this is their crowning achievement.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Can confirm. Our Eastern Bloc pasta didn't have windows under communism.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago