Sadly this pictures already have been debunked before. Letβs wait and see what new damage the bridge has suffered, first pictures show a better result then last time.
this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
97 points (92.9% liked)
Ukraine
8546 readers
635 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
πΊπ¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
π»π€’No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
π₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
π·Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
β Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
π³π₯ Donate to support Ukraine's Defense
π³βοΈβοΈ Donate to support Humanitarian Aid
πͺ π«‘ Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Thanks bro. Im really happy you're here to say that they're debunked if they truly are. Obviously I'm not aware of such thing, could you provide some citation? In good faith always! I'll upvote your comment obviously after seeing the debunking is from a trustable source and is really a debunking, just wondering. Nonetheless, thanks. Let's debunk misinformation.
^[Citation needed]
It wasn't built by Russians, but by some Danish company.
Thank you both guys for trying to debate that. Helps provide information about it. Upvote both of u for trying to debunk this.