this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
220 points (96.2% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54819 readers
353 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So a bunch of people in this subreddit told me that uTorrent was trash and to switch to QBitTorrent.

I didn't think much of it. How could one be so much better than the other? They're both just torrent downloaders.

Holy shit was I wrong. I don't even really understand what is happening, but downloading torrents on QBitTorrent is so, so, so much faster and I don't even understand how.

A movie downloads in basically seconds compared to 10 or 20 minutes on uTorrent.

Why is this? What is this magic? What makes QBitTorrent so much faster?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 144 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 10 months ago

Ever since uTorrent started mining on users computers, ive been on QBT

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Is it still being updated? I ran from it when I knew Transmission and Qbittorrent were a thing.

[–] [email protected] 87 points 10 months ago (1 children)

uTorrent has been down the shitter for over a decade now, I wouldn't be surprised if the download speed was throttled without a pro subscription. It could also be a difference in how the applications discover seeds, or how much CPU time or memory is allocated to downloads.

As a general rule, if an application is full of anti-features, it tends to have better, usually FOSS, alternatives.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And alternativeto.net is the place to find them alternatives

[–] [email protected] 58 points 10 months ago (1 children)

uTorrent doesn't play well in the landscape of the modern bittorrent protocol. It's also adware, infringes upon your privacy, and is a malware risk.

qBittorrent is my client of choice, but other popular and great clients are Deluge (only up to ~500 torrents), transmission, and rtorrent (on Linux). There's other clients as well but YMMV, especially if you do any private tracker usage.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Agrred, QBT and Deluge are great options

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ya, my only issue with Deluge is after ~500 torrents it starts to slow. I'm on private trackers, so I always tend to have ~2,000 torrents seeding at once. For my particular usecase, it simply becomes too slow and bogged down to be viable.

Granted, I've not used Deluge in some 2 or 3 years; maybe they improved process handling since then? I'd love to be corrected if so.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hmm, not sure. Ive been on deluge for a while but ive used QBT before. Might be time to benchmark again

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

If you do, I'd be interested to hear results. Deluge's plugins are nice and it's easy to make your own. If it wasn't for the performance issues, I'd likely still be there.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Utorrent kind of went really downhill and sold itself. Nobody should ever use utorrent anymore

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-VEB4NLGMM

Tldr; bittorrent bought out utorrent and started putting ads in the client

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=GS6uWKCO_S8

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago (5 children)

TIL I'm the only one who says "microtorrent".

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I always thought that was what everyone said, as that's actually how it's spelled. I wasn't even aware it was called different by some or even most people, although I suppose I shouldn't be surprised as I can imagine many people not knowing the greek alphabet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

You're not alone brother. There are dozens of us! Dozens!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't know if uTorrent does ratelimit torrents someway (they shouldn't be by theory), but it being adware is enough of a result to switch to another torrent client.

I'm more of a fan of Deluge, but alternatives like qBittorrent / Transmission are solid choices.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Trasmission never worked well for me, on the other hand qBittorrent did the job perfectly.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago

I'm assuming you mean you were using one of the older, "safe" versions of uTorrent. But yeah, the technology has updated. It's better.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

QBittorrent has been my torrent Client for 4/5 years at this point, never having problems. It works on my Steam Deck too (Arch).

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

I have had the same experience switching from deluge to qbittorrrent. It’s like, another world.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

You were probably using the wrong version of utorrent.

I think you need something like 1.6. No adware, no malware, just works fast and easy.

[–] Untitled4774 9 points 10 months ago (4 children)

There are a handful of features that I really like with qbittorrent but there were plugins I can’t find replacements for from Deluge:

  • having items deleted after meeting seeding requirements, as *arr auto imports, but having exceptions for private trackers
  • the above without having the *arr stack have a permanent warning
  • auto adding public default trackers to any public torrent

I’ve switched back and forth a few times and I run them side by side but let deluge take the reins of most of it because I have it set up to be hands off with the above.

If anyone knows how I can set up qbt the same way that would be great though

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Untitled4774 5 points 10 months ago

Beautiful! Thanks so much

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

The third should be possible with this maintained fork:

https://github.com/c0re100/qBittorrent-Enhanced-Edition

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

I do miss that really detailed block download page, but that's only cos I'd watch it instead of doing something useful with my life.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I switch from uTorrent to qBittorrent when Ninite dropped it. I wasn't aware that uTorrent had become aware, and Ninite had my back. I trust those guys with the selection of softwares they offer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

qbittorrent also has better theme support in my opinion. Dracula theme is even available for both the local client and WebUI server client: https://draculatheme.com/qbittorrent

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

UT has been garbage for some time. I reckon the data it uses to send your info back to them and to load ads, bogs down the network, especially on slower networks. The last time I used it, there were also graphical artifacts all over. Qbit on the other hand, is much cleaner and simpler to use, and it doesnt add any unwanted network traffic, which is why it's probably faster

load more comments
view more: next ›