this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
263 points (99.3% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3589 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 151 points 7 months ago (1 children)

you and your unborn child will die, for the life of the fetus.

Republican healthcare, everyone

[–] [email protected] 39 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Republican Healthcare: Pro death panel, pro medical debt

The worst of all possible worlds

[–] [email protected] 96 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I truly hope anyone that wishes to abandon Idaho and seek freedom will have the means and opportunity to do so as quickly as possible. Idaho isn't just an unsafe place for women. It's no longer a safe place to practice medicine which means it's not a safe place for anyone.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 7 months ago

This is such a huge issue for red states. It’s hard enough to recruit docs in rural areas (assuming the local hospital is even financially viable, although critical access hospitals do get extra funding) and now it’s going to be that much harder. Who wants to practice in a place where you can go to jail for doing your job?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago

When the people who can flee have fled, the state will still have two senators.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Abortion bans are so fucking evil. Taking away essential health care and bodily autonomy because of a fairy tale. All of this for votes for a political party.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

because of a fairy tale

That is the baffling and infuriating part of it all. It's like we would base laws and social structure on "The Emperor's New Clothes", "Hansel and Gretel" or "The Three Little Pigs".

It is absurd but here we are, a very large portion of the world believes in some form of fairy tale to justify real world implications, rules and law based on such a fairy tales. And then also have the gall to block or impede real world science based on such a fairy tale.

Over evolved scared little monkeys prone to believe in the boogie man, that's what we are.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

It's only a matter of time until someone dies because of this law, and unfortunately it's likely to be a child rape victim.
It almost happened here in Ohio when a 10-year-old had to travel to Indiana to get the abortion and the state still tried have the doctor in Indiana investigated for using a 10 year old rape victim to "push her political agenda".
It's absolutely nauseating that roughly half the country still wants to vote for these fucks.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Not to be pedantic, but it is nowhere near half the country. There is an absurdly significant over representation of Republican politicians for several reasons:

  • The Senate is not a proportionally representative body, therefore the less populous states that make up the majority of the country have significantly more power than they otherwise would, and these states are predominantly Republican.

  • Gerrymandering allows states that are much more purple than you would assume (like Texas for example) to be hostily controlled by the Republican party even in areas that would otherwise lean more heavily blue.

  • The suppression of voting rights by the Republican party. This includes schemes to prevent accessible vote by mail options for the entire country, which is a super easy problem to solve. However, solving it would allow apathetic voters who otherwise wouldn't vote or those who can't easily access polling stations due to work, disability, or other reasons to vote regularly. Then you get into the fact that we are basically the only country where national elections days aren't a mandatory holiday.

I could go on, but the point is that we currently live in a system of minority rule. The true number of legitimate Republic voters in this country is roughly 30% of the voting age public. The Republican party knows that the demographics are skewed insurmountably towards the liberal/progressive with each passing year. They cannot win the numbers game, not even close. The only way they continue to win is to erode democracy, destroy people's faith in government, and game the judicial system.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You could go on, but I think it's worth adding that just like the Senate isn't proportionally represented by population, even if the house weren't gerrymanderd, it wouldn't either.

They haven't kept up with adding house seats based off population making it even worse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If you based the number of reps in the original bill of rights, they would be limited to 50000 people. https://thirty-thousand.org/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

6600 reps vs 435.

Things would be so different

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

The only way they continue to win is to erode democracy

There you have it - the GOP grand plan, and the MAGA cult will provide the cyanide for their own Kool-Aid

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

its like 30% of the country that reliably votes for these trash goblins, the problem is like 70% of the billionaires support them because the republicans will give them all the tax cuts and hand jobs they'll ever want. Most the billionaires also own a majority of the press so the propaganda guns are only getting bigger faster and dumber.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

70%? Try 99%.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

L̶i̶f̶e̶
L̶i̶b̶e̶r̶t̶y̶
T̶h̶e̶ p̶u̶r̶s̶u̶i̶t̶ o̶f̶ h̶a̶p̶p̶i̶n̶e̶s̶s̶

[–] [email protected] 39 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Jesus christ, everyone in that story comes across as trashy to me but the kidnapping charge is ridiculous. I don't think you should have any claim to parental rights when you don't know where your 15 year old daughter has been living for months. How about arresting her mom and charging her with neglect/abandonment or whatever relevant law is on the books in Idaho? But hey, Republicans once again prove they don't actually care about protecting kids and this has always been about controlling women.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago

When I lived in Idaho clothing stores were not allowed to put women's underwear on display. Women literally had to leave the state to buy underwear. (This was before Internet commerce became mainstream - back in the 90's).

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

this is why it's legal and morally acceptable to punch ~~nazis~~ republicans

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

You repeat yourself.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

Welp, that's enough internet for today.