this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
263 points (99.3% liked)

Linux

49761 readers
603 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

To speed up working with slow hardware and for overall convenience, we’re now also offering binary packages for download and direct installation! For most architectures, this is limited to the core system and weekly updates - not so for amd64 and arm64 however. There we’ve got a stunning >20 GByte of packages on our mirrors, from LibreOffice to KDE Plasma and from Gnome to Docker. Gentoo stable, updated daily. Enjoy! And read on for more details!

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Quite the statement that Gentoo has survived for so long compiling from source but, even with ever advancing processor speeds, they've finally gone "Nah... Takes to long. ".

I mean, I don't blame them. Yesterday I left my machine building a PyTorch package for 4 hours on a 12 core processor.

[–] taladar 56 points 1 year ago (4 children)

As a long-time Gentoo user the only packages where compile times (and RAM usage) really bother me are all the myriad of forks of that shitty Chrome browser engine (webkit-gtk, QtWebEngine, chromium,...) and LLVM and clang.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Chrome takes so much longer than the kernel somehow. There's also the occasional package that makes you build single-threaded because nobody has fixed some race condition in the build process.

[–] taladar 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More importantly Chrome takes so much longer than Firefox even though they essentially do the same things (or 95% the same things if you are nitpicky).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, but Chromium is very easy to embed in applications. Mozilla has a history of creating and then abandoning embedding APIs every few years or so (and right now I think they have none).

[–] taladar 3 points 1 year ago

It seems very hard to embed it anywhere considering everyone doing so forks the whole codebase. Besides, my point was about compile times, embedding APIs shouldn't take significantly longer to compile.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

My beef tends to be with software out of FANGs. Big teams and huge codebase to match. Completely inpetetrable for the rest of us and, I suspect, far more code then there should be.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I once shredded an sdcard-as-home while trying to compile firefox. This is why i say the web is broken. Needs a fucking kernel++ to display webpages.

[–] taladar 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair USB sticks and SD cards seem to fail when you stare at them a bit too intensely. I think it has been at least a decade since I bought a USB stick for OS installations that lasted for more than three installs (each a few months apart at least since the need does not arise that often).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ok, i usually go for speedy ones, a bit more expensive, maybe they have better chips.

I once read, some higher quality USB sticks even have SSD style wear leveling. While cheap sticks have the worst quality flash (good q for SSD, medium for SD an 'barely usable' for sticks).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Chromium with wayland and X support is by far the greatest offender that I have found.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To think the day Gentoo goes binary would finally come...

Next: Slackware get automatic dependency resolution

[–] pastermil 24 points 1 year ago

I hate to be the one breaking the news, but...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Well we've had binary packages for ages for big builds like firerox and default is still to use source packages.

Still I'm really excited for this, having the whole, or big parts of the package tree, will speed up initial installations by a lot on weak arm systems for example. Now initial installation can be done quick and later you could still compile stuff yourself for the full gentoo experience.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Heretics! The true chosen use Exherbo!

(No, seriously, this is fine. And there's nothing keeping people from doing full source-based still.)

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gentoo "purist": "Welp, Gentoo is now officially dead."

Non-gentoo user: "Welp, Gentoo is now just another Arch fork LMAO!"

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Non-gentoo user: “Welp, Gentoo is now just another Arch fork LMAO!”

To be fair, you can still build packages and fine-tune the builds with the Emerge system flags, which is sort-of Gentoo's killer feature. It is just that they have recognized that most people will install probably 99% of all software without changing the default flags, and so why not give them those packages pre-built.

So I guess this make Gentoo more similar to Nix OS or Guix OS but without the high-tech package manager and dependency resolution.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

literally 2 days ago i tried installing gentoo in a vm but gave up because it would take too long to compile... and now this??? guess my timing was pretty bad

if i did use gentoo, i'd probably compile smaller programs from source and bigger things like kernel and web browser i would use as binaries.

[–] pastermil 10 points 1 year ago

I think this is the sign from the universe you've been waiting for!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Seems kinda pointless to compile most packages unless there are specific performance optimizations or non-default features that can be enabled. I think the way I would use this would be to do binary by default and build only on the occasional instance there is a tangible benefit.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I stopped using Gentoo because compiling everything was a major waste of time, but I have missed world files since then. This is a great reason to reconsider Gentoo for my next machine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

FWIW, Alpine Linux has a nice world file, too. And I am continually impressed by the selection of up to date packages in their Edge repos.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can the file be split into different files like in Gentoo? I used to have different files for basic stuff, gaming, hardware specific, etc, so I could keep the parts of the Configs I wanted from one machine to another.

If so I'll definitely check it out, been meaning to try Alpine since for what I understand it's not GNU, right? Which should put a final nail in the GNU+Linux copy pasta hahahah.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think apk would check multiple files for the world. But you could maintain them outside the apk mechanisms, just concatenating them into a single file, with tup/make/sh/whatever.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Makes sense, I actually have a tool for that sort of thing that I wrote for i3 configs (it's called CFC and it's here in case you want to use it https://gitlab.com/Nibodhika/cfc )

[–] Drito 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Alpine Linux is the most sane distro I tried. The absence of glibc brought limitations unfortunately, but it is the fault of developers that uses that shit instead of pure libc.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I think it's a good move. It doesn't take anything away from people who want to keep compiling everything, but now people on especially old laptops can enjoy the distro too.

Though I will probably continue being a void user this makes me want to use gentoo more then it did before.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Love this change. I wonder if I can install a binary-based Gentoo distro and gradually progress from there, if I wanted to, with locally compiled packages that partially replace the binaries. I hope this is not an all-or-nothing situation, so better read the announcement.

EDIT: Hey, yes we can!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] pastermil 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Gen-toobin

The distro for white water rafters.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I've been a Gentoo user since 2004 or so and used to crosscompile binaries in like 2006 for all of my systems including some sparc and ppc builds on my main servers. It was glorious. I adore Gentoo for portage and the ability to dream up a set of OS decisions and then actually do it, dog food and all. I'll probably never not have some form of a Gentoo system within reach but mostly for nostalgic reasons but VMs and containers now fill my needs.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Good for them

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Been using Gentoo on my server for over a decade now and probably won't ever leave the compiling front, especially with a 12-core/24-thread CPU making it go as quick as regular binary updates on my mint laptop... But that being said, in happy to see them considering to do this. It'll bring in some folks who are afraid of (or just dislike) compiling everything from source. I think the biggest packages that'd benefit from this are definitely the browsers and desktop environments.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hm? Didn't they already offer binary packages for a while now?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The official binhost project has been an experimental thing until now, I've personally been using it for the year on multiple machines, but it's not been something that you can just enable. And it's definitely not been something that's come pre-prepared in the stage 3.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

that makes it usable! might give it a try.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Wow, when I went to bed yesterday it was only December 28, but now it is somehow already April 1!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Good, I might try it now.

When you have more life behind you than ahead of you, time suddenly becomes precious.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

This is what Gentoo needed. I've been using it for a long time and love it as it is but sometimes when there's a bunch of slot conflicts or a compile error it makes me wish I just dealt with binaries instead. Now that we have the best of both worlds, it will make Gentoo appeal to a wider userbase and make it less painful to use on older hardware.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm enthralled by this. It really makes it easier to support other people's gentoo installations while allowing one to still optimise the ever last drop of life blood out of one's own packages! Love to see it!

[–] Secret300 1 points 1 year ago

That weirdly makes me wanna try it less. That was it's whole thing. It's a convenient thing tho

[–] spez 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So before this you had to somehow obtain a binary and install it manually? Help gentoo users, where am I wrong?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

When Arch switching to brew as one and only package manager

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Outside of the whole compiling from source thing, What are selling points of Gentoo over Arch?

Seems most Gentoo users I've ran into are either diehards about compiling their own packages or they've simply used it for over a decade and are super familiar with it.