this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
755 points (99.2% liked)

Memes

49487 readers
1589 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
755
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Angry_Maple to c/[email protected]
 

Not OC

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Triggered. Fake pngs should be a crime.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You mean fake transparency, right?

[–] Angry_Maple 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I didn't make this, I'm not sure who the OC creator is. I think the joke is that the "png" is actually a jpeg

Thanks, I'll add that it's not OC, almost forgot

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

On Google Images in your search you can click "Tools", "Color", then select "Transparent" to automatically filter these 😉

[–] Angry_Maple 2 points 2 years ago

Thank you for sharing!

[–] crazyminner 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If you go to google images and add: filetype:PNG to your search, It will only give you pngs which have transparency.

[–] Angry_Maple 1 points 2 years ago

Thanks for sharing!

[–] thiccdiccnicc 1 points 2 years ago

Plenty of pngs have opaque backgrounds though. Doesn't necessarily fix it once and for all although you won't accidentally click jpgs

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Ever since Google made that major change where they can't show you direct image URLs I've switched to using duckduckgo for image search. Works much better and you get way less fake transparency by default in your search results.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Angry_Maple 1 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Or PNGs with watermarks 😤.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Hate sites that do this, off with their heads! 🪓

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I don't get why does do that... Or how.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago
[–] PeterPoopshit 1 points 2 years ago

Why do they do that though? It takes the same amount of effort to give users a transparent png as a png or jpg with fake transparency. In fact it probably takes extra work to make those stupid fake transparency backgrounds. Is inconveniencing people looking for transparent pngs really that profitable?

load more comments
view more: next ›