this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
318 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19150 readers
2470 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The right thinks the left is going to force their kids to get sex changes, the center and left see the right as wanting to end voting rights

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the center and left see the right as wanting to end voting rights

It's less of "see the right" and more of "has observed the right". We just had Moore v. Harper which had republicans pushing the independent state legislature theory where they argued state legislatures had sole authority to decide how elections are conducted and could change the rules however they wanted. Even if it meant disenfranchising voters. Thankfully SCOTUS shot it down.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry if I wasn’t clear. By see I meant literally see it happen before their eyes. See=observe

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Nah, you're cool. A little bit of a fail on my part. I'm hyped up on caffeine and see the change in your sentence from "thinks" to "see".

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile the actual left is largely ignored.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Right view of Left: satanist groomers
Right view of Center: sheeple
Right view of Right: "you're white enough, you can date my daughter if I can date yours"

Center view of Left: unionized HR professionals with blue hair
Center view of Center: ordinary chill folks
Center view of Right: scary uncles and/or scary incels

Left view of Left: splitters!
Left view of Center: sheeple
Left view of Right: "you realize y'all are actual fucking Nazi pedos, yeah?"

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We haven't had real democracy since Dubya stole office; who are we even kidding anymore?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Speaking in terms of economic power, we pretty much haven't had real democracy ever.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Sad but true; ultimately capitalism can't allow democracy. Its end goal is just feudalism with extra steps.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

eh, democracy is fine but the current batch of politicians are fucked. we need to get a batch of under 50 year old folks in congress/senate/white house. enough of these 70+ year old geezers.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Lack of voting is one problem, but the overarching problem is how we select our representatives. We have a two party system with winner takes all elections which cements the two party system. You pretty much have to vote for one party or the other otherwise you're essentially throwing away your vote. Personally, I think a system like ranked choice would be an improvement. At least then you could vote your conscience, and if your first choice doesn't make it then your vote goes towards your 2nd, 3rd, etc. A system like that should produce a result that is closer to the ideological center of the voters.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A huge chunk of Trump supporters never voted before he ran, watch out for what you wish for.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

That was also how Bush won in 2004. He expanded the electorate. There was also a bunch of other crap going on, but that was crucial to his win.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Hard to be pessimistic about something that doesn't exist. The US is not a democracy and never has been. Our votes are not equal and there are many institutions in place to ensure that our vote can just not matter whenever is convenient for those in power, both on state and federal levels.

Edit: remember when we voted for the Supreme Court members? Lol. It's all a joke fam.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Quick Civics Lesson: A Representative Republic IS a form of democracy. Saying the United States isn't a democracy is false.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Exactly. It's an imperfect democracy with some anti-democratic institutions, for sure-- but to say it's not a democracy is simply not accurate.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Oh no, think of the accuracy! Be blind to what your eyes see as long as you can cling to a definition you learned in grade school that was propaganda to begin with lmao.

It's like if a nail salon is a front for money laundering and I say "hey that nail salon is a front!" and the pedants come back with "ACK-shually, that is indeed a nail salon." No fucking shit. It's true purpose is a front, despite the fact that it functions as a nail salon AND a front.

The US is functioning as intended, with a thin veneer of "democracy" to keep it "legitimate" in the eyes of the world.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

The United States is controlled by oligarchs who are above the law. Big Tech is censoring everyone and gathering data on everyone for law enforcement agencies.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Perhaps it has something to do with how popular policies aren't passed but unpopular policies are?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

American's are caught up in so much BS that doesn't matter. We aren't even capable of focusing on what does matter. All the facts are right there in front of us but we ignore them. We are turning away from science and returning to superstition and religious fanaticism. This whole republic/democracy experiment thing needs competent, clear thinking people to keep it together. It doesnt matter if they are believers or not, they just need to be sane. There seems to be less and less of those people running around or at least speaking up about it. If we keep going down the road we are going now, there is no hope for us. We may have already lost the battle and just dont realize it yet.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I don't think the US has ever not been overly religious. Most of its history has been full of religious people doing terrible things and framing social issues in religious terms.

Colonization? Religion. Ethnic cleansing of the natives? Religion. Manifest destiny? Religion. The Mexican-American war? Religion. Prohibition? Religion. The Red Scare? Religion. The Ku Klux Klan and other racists? Better believe it's religion.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

We have so much tension because we're at a tipping point between long held religious dominance and a future where religious beliefs alone will no longer have the power to sway public policy. It's just a question of how long this is going to take.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

There is no democracy in the United States, the ultra rich just gather in the same room and throw money at the table to decide the next president.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sure vote, but don't fool yourselves that it has a very significant influence. The degree of manipulation by gerrymandering, partisan structures, bias toward rural southern states in the electoral college, and billionaire corporate dark money spending leaves the actual accuracy of voting in question.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Voting is basically the little brother playing the video game in "2 player" mode even though the controller is not plugged in scenario. That's what being working class in the US feels like lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, Ohio is so messed up. So many times the map was shot down, but they used it anyway. It's unjust.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really think we are almost at taxation without representation, we should look into that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

lol what are you gonna do, protest? rofl

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe it's time to rethink everything, and stop acting like we can just go back to brunch.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I can't possibly imagine why!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It'd work a lot better if y'all would read a book and we started getting rid of shit like the electoral college. And Congress. And the Supreme Court. And the presidency.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Seriously. We're living in the 21st century. Why are us citizens not the ones voting for every law and policy change? Just spitballing here, but maybe we could use one of those computers we all keep in our pockets?

load more comments
view more: next ›