Sorry I'm new to the networky world of things, could someone explain what TLS and DNS (seen it in settings here and there) are, and the differences between them.
this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
23 points (92.6% liked)
Linux
46775 readers
1968 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by AlpΓ‘r-Etele MΓ©der, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
DNS = Domain Name System. This is used to lookup an IP address (e.g. 123.234.54.32) from a domain name (e.g. lemmy.ml). A DNS query is one of the first things your computer does when you visit a site.
Plain DNS is unencrypted, which means that anyone with the ability to read your requests (e.g. your ISP) can see the names of sites that you're visiting.
TLS = Transport Layer Security. This is a protocol that's used to create an encrypted connection between your device and another one, in this case the DNS server. When this is used, the content of your DNS requests is hidden. Your ISP can still see that you're talking to the DNS server, but not what you're saying to it.
TLS also allows your device to cryptographically verify the identity of the DNS server. Without it, someone with the ability to modify your connection could change the responses from the DNS server. That would allow them to send you back the IP address of a server they control, rather than the real servers IP.
Ensure you have systemd-resolved installed on your Linux system.
Oh boy.
Man, did you really have to make it dependent on systemd?
It's designed for systemd-resolved, so I would assume that he had to. ;)
Ah, missed that. Thanks
Cool project! Do you know Captive portals? Because there you need to use DHCP DNS a lot, and turn off dnssec and dot afaik
That was also my question. A broader question is how to access services on the local network that are announced through local DNS? Like your router's web interface or any similar device.
Can you have split routing? Most queries go to our preferred DNSoverTLS endpoint, but some go to DNS53 on the local network.
This would also solve the captive portal if the host used to detect captive portals is always resolved locally.
Yes I think you can exclude local IPs in systemd-resolved
Hello! That's something that I should keep an eye on! When speaking about Captive Portals, I just assume everyone uses 4G/5G (which doesn't require these portals to be used) instead of open networks. My script already has DNSSEC disabled since it has caused some problems during testing. BTW, just a question : Are these portals very common? I haven't seen one since years now.
In Germany every public wifi, train (ICE windows block cell internetand they are currently lasering small waves in them), hotels, cafes, private wifis even if you are a guest.
Because of "data protection" everyone needs to accept TOS so every network has them.
No idea where you live but cell data is often expensive.
I just use the MullvadVPN app, my systemd-resolved is plain and insecure and Mullvad does all the secure DNS stuff. Obviously sucks and is not scalable at all.
Systemd implementing a switch that could then be integrated into GUIs, like KDE6's captive portal opener, is crucial. So for the portals you would make the DNS insecure, log in and secure it again. Best automatically.
Ok. I will see that! If you have a GitHub account. You can make an issue right now, so tracking the issue would be better for me. Or I could do that myself.
Edit : I have made a prototype that I could release it soon as an alpha. When it gets released, your goal is to test in a place where captive portals are present. Sadly, the script won't be automatic but requires user interaction.
Edit 2 : it is now available as alpha on the releases page.
Cool!
Have you looked into how existing software handles captive portals. I believe, both Ubuntu (or Gnome or Network-Manager) and Firefox do check for such portals and detect real internet access. (They simple poll some URL http://detectportal.vendor.com and check for the expected return code. Portals usually redirect.)
Now I'm thinking, what if this check could trigger a change to the DNS configuration. That is use DoT when internet is available, otherwise fall back to DHCP announced DNS
That is neat! It is a specific response so it should work.
#!/bin/bash
# Function to set insecure DNS
function insecure-dns() {
# Backup the original resolved.conf file
cp /etc/systemd/resolved.conf /etc/systemd/resolved.conf.bak
# Modify resolved.conf to disable custom DNS, DoT, and DNSSEC
sed -i 's/^DNS=.*/#DNS=/; s/^Domains=.*/#Domains=/; s/^DNSOverTLS=.*/#DNSOverTLS=/; s/^DNSSEC=.*/#DNSSEC=/' /etc/systemd/resolved.conf
# Restart systemd-resolved
systemctl restart systemd-resolved
}
# Function to set secure DNS
function secure-dns() {
# Restore the original resolved.conf file
mv /etc/systemd/resolved.conf.bak /etc/systemd/resolved.conf
# Restart systemd-resolved
systemctl restart systemd-resolved
}
while true; do
response=$(curl -sI captive.test.com | head -n 1 | cut -d' ' -f2)
if [ "$response" == "200" ]; then
insecure-dns
xdg-open captive.test.com
sleep 30
# something to wait until window is closed, otherwise spam!
else
secure-dns
fi
sleep 5
done
This should work. What would be needed is to track the process of the login and only continue when the window is closed again.
I have edited the release page for the alpha. I have modified the file to correct a bug and add the deletion of the backup file when the operation is finished and also restart systemd-resolved service.
No need for a systemd switch. It should work with a dedicated "portal" browser that bypasses the global dns and has a built-in resolver using the dns from dhcp.
Yes if that works for sure. Problem here is that GNOME and KDE use different webengines, so yay no standards. Firefox doesnt support that I think?
I use a seperate firefox profile with a shortcut like
blabla desktop entry
Name=Captive Portal
Exec=mullvad-exclude firefox -P captive http://captive.kuketz.de
I wanted to do something with mullvad-exclude but that didnt work for some reason, as when excluding it I think it had no internet?