OVERLAYS
Sorry for shouting, but they are very annoying.
NO I DO NOT WANT TO SIGN UP FOR YOUR NEWSLETTER, BLOGGER WITH A RECIPE I NO LONGER WANT
this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
79 points (96.5% liked)
Asklemmy
43148 readers
2176 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Agreed. So many websites want you to sign up for their newsletter before you've even read the first line of text.
Even they aren't as bad as the sites that ask for feedback as soon as they open >.<
Also: THIS SITE IS BETTER IN THE APP! Every time you open the site.
If I wanted to use the app, I'd have it installed by now.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Agreed. Anything that pops up in front of the content I want to see, can fuck off!
Those were popup windows years ago and every browser started blocking them and does to this day. I wish they would start blocking overlays too.
I fucking hate this.
When they ask you about cookies and you can "accept all" in one click, but if you want to reject all that aren't strictly necessary you have to navigate to a different page
Yeah, this should be illegal. I predict California and/or the EU will get rid of it soonish (within the next 10 years maybe? not the most experienced forecaster).
It is IIRC. In the eu I think its mandatory that declining cookies is as easy as accepting.
Which is better but still sucks. The whole thing is flawed from the ground up: In order to remember you opted out of cookies, it is necessary to store a cookie in your browser. Cookies should be op-in but I think it's obvious this is not gonna happen
Pretty sure a cookie like that would fall under strictly necessary, so you're still allowed to save it without consent.
Protip: Use a VPN and connect to an EU country. You'll see more of the single "Reject All" buttons.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Chat boxes that popup so that a bot can "help" you find products
Bonus points if it plays audio
Ok god yes, kill it with fire. Any pop-ups that open on the home page of a website actually. Are you trying to get me to immediately leave your site??
load more comments
(1 replies)
For me it's Google search's tab order. They always switch up the tabs for web, images, videos, etc. depending on what you search for. It makes the experience very unpredictable and annoying.
Recently they've also started putting related searches next to the tabs π€¦
This is so frustrating, and another reason I'm going to try to stop using Google.
ok i thought i was going crazy, that's the most frustrating thing
i only ever use regular search and image search
if i want shopping results i'll look at walmart or amazon
if i want video results im just searching right on youtube
i don't need a million different tabs
On mobile browser: the ad that "loads" under your finger when you tap on something.
Without counting user-hostile design: automatically playing any sort of sound as soon as you enter the website. Specially radio. Thankfully at least Firefox doesn't allow this crap any more,
Oh my god I hate twitch for autoplaying some random stream I don't want to watch on the front page
Not in any special order
- cookie banners
- auto playing anything
- sideways scrolling
sideways scrolling
Also: scroll-jacking.
I decide how many lines I want to scroll with the wheel and I also intentionally disabled "smooth scrolling". No need to change that, thank you, stupid website!
load more comments
(1 replies)
- Use consent-o-matic extension in Firefox
- Firefox seems to block auto playing videos
- I don't know any way to fix it, it's website's fault
load more comments
(4 replies)
The ones names already are worst than this one but it needs to be here
Hello, I am a useless Chat Bot, you can ask me any questions but I will certainly not know what you want
This "mobile first" thing. No, I don't want 20px fonts for text or absurdly large buttons to click on with my mouse cursor.
And scrolling up and down constantly cause there's not enough screenspace to show all the information (because 90% of the screenspace is empty or used for enourmous padding)
When the site hijacks the scroll to play some animation as you scroll down the page
Autoplay while scrolling.
Literally why do news websites play some random unrelated video when I'm trying to read an article...
When a website changes the scrolling to be smooth and slow. Like I don't want my scrolling to accelerate really slowly for ages and then decelerate for the same amount of time, I want my scrolling to be quick and responsive.
Also when websites change scrolling to be anything other than scrolling, like the iMac 24-inch Website when the scrolling animates the screen and stand instead of just scrolling.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Those horrible news sites where they show these ads for all kinds of garbage as you try to go back to the previous page you were on.
"would you like to receive notifications in your browser from this site?"
No. No I would not.
Mousing over a UI element causes it to expand and cover neighboring UI elements.
Floating menu bars that scroll with the page.
Overriding the browser's built in keyboard combos and context menus.
"Hero" header images.
Requiring Javascript to render static text.
Styling the scrollbar.
Modal dialogs of any kind.
Breaking the "Back" button.
load more comments
(1 replies)
This modern one-page website style, where when you click on a Link in the menu it just scrolls you down to that part.
I mean it's ok for Wikipedia where you basically have a document, but I hate it for multimedia or company stuff.
Most of the time it's coupled with these animation instead of actually scrolling shit.
Algoritmes that make sure u can't find a post again when u mis click or something. Facebook/Instagram drive me nuts because of this.
That popup asking about cookies because they cause cancer in California or whatever. It should auto decline cookies and have a button at the bottom to manually sign over your first born child if you choose to do so.
When it has an overlay video that fills up to half the screen even if you scroll. And the X button is not even being shown.
load more comments
(1 replies)
When youβre on a shopping site and a little pop up appears over the picture of the item telling you how many people have bought it in the last day and how many have viewed it. I donβt care!! Just let me see the actual item!
I wouldn't be surprised if those numbers are made up. Just dark patterns to make it seem like the product is hot.
Though I've found it kinda interesting when websites show little messages like "Someone from country just bought item!".
Cookies policy
Unskippable tutorials.
- Overriding the default scroll behavior
- Headers and footers that only appear when you approach them
load more comments
(2 replies)
Forgetting your place after logging in or switching between mobile and desktop modes.
When a website features an (embedded) video at the top and you need to scroll down to read the text unterneath the video:
If not disabled by your browser, the video playback starts. You stop the video. You beginn to scroll down to read the text unter the video, because you don't want to watch the video. Now the video pops out and begins to play and hovers over the area where the text is displayed.
News websites are prone to this behavior.
Being 100x the size and 'modern feel' with 1x the content than we used to have
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next βΊ