Science Memes

11148 readers

3146 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

837

launch him anyway (mander.xyz)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

64 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Besides, if you really needed those kinds of speed, you'd obviously have to calculate with relativistic formulas. Energy is asymptotical at the speed of light.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

100 km/sec is not relativistic and even if it were, at no point would that object need to or could exceed the speed of light. Its a fundamental limit that cant be broken.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Setting aside the correctness in OP for the moment, what's being said here is that you don't actually need to break lightspeed. The foot would have to be moving asymptomaticly close to lightspeed, but not passing it. OP used an equasion that works classically, but we're in territory where that model breaks down.

But if the math doesn't work out that way, anyway, then whatever, classical equasions are fine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah, I was refering to the OP's calculated result in that it's incorrect not only by incorrect math, but also incorrect physics.