Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
Can you show me where he was convicted? Must have missed that.
He owes 91 million for defaming the woman he raped. You radicalized cultists are footing the bill. How can you miss this?
That isn’t a conviction. Do you not understand civil vs criminal court?
Rape is rape, man.
. I get you want to use new speak but words have meanings. It’s how we convey ideas. The jury specifically did not find him liable for rape. Even if they had, it’s not called a conviction.
A jury found him liable. Then trump defamed his rape victim, twice. A jury found him liable for 5 million, then 81 million. Now he has defamed his rape victim again, and will be sued again. And you brainwashed cultists will pay off his crime bills AGAIN.
Lmao, you didn't use newspeak accurately. It involves the process of reducing available words.
Kinda like what your objective in that conversation is. Except that it still isn't even close to the term you are trying to apply
The reduction is liable to convicted. That is a reduction of words. smh
Smh is a great example of newspeak