Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
Well it just goes to show the hypocrisy of evangelical and socially conservative voters. Jesus never said anything about gay people but there is a direct quote from Jesus in the book of Matthew about divorce. Trump is on his third wife and was unfaithful at least once if news reports are to be believed.
What a choice: The old and confused current president hands out bombs with one hand and humanitarian aid with the other. The other option is a rapist and criminal up to his eyeballs in debt for his misdeeds. These are symptoms of a system that is breaking down.
Trump has never been convicted of rape. Liberals keep repeating that but it’s a a libelous comment to make. Trump has never been charged with rape
Simping over trump. I wonder how you people will look back in this in 10 or 15 years.
Facts are not simping. Trump has not been convicted or even charged with rape.
Why do you hate facts? It’s strange how the left lies then thinks if they repeat them lie, someone will believe them.
You don't need to be convicted in a court to be a rapist, nor to be called a rapist. Convicted in a court requires the highest burden of proof. That's not the level of proof we require for general discussions, nor is it for who should or shouldn't be a candidate for president.
You actually do. If we used the same criteria we used for Trump then Biden is a rapist as well.
So then OJ isn't a murderer, is that your stance?
No, OJ is not a murderer. He was acquitted of a crime.
Tara Reade. There is more evidence that Tara Reade was assaulted by Biden than Trump assaulted Jean.
So the civil jury that found him guilty committed libel? If someone is found guilty of voluntary manslaughter, you think that means people in casual conversation couldn't call them a murderer?
If you want to call biden a rapist because you think Tara Reade's account is credible, that's fine. Go for it. But people are allowed to look at the facts as they see them and make judgments. And just because a jury doesn't convict someone that doesn't mean they didn't commit the crime
I don't know any educated people who would. He was not convicted of murder, and legal libel is a low standard to meet.
There is zero evidence that Trump committed rape on Jean. She doesn't know the most basic facts. I get you dislike Trump, but banana courts are just damaging to the whole country.
Hahaha. You don't know ANYone "educated" that would call someone who intentionally killed someone, but was convicted of a lower crime, a murderer. Ok sure.
No one's talking about a court, we're talking about casual discourse between civilians. Oh wait, except for the court that found trump responsible for sexual abuse
What does this even mean? The jury found him liable for sexual abuse. What crazy mental gymnastics are you doing to suggest that they "agreed with the lack of evidence"?
Any reasonable person with a hint of intelligence would have told her to go pound sand. Basically her evidence was she said it happened. Nothing else.
There is no way to defend yourself from such insanity.
"Trump is a convicted rapist" and "Trump is a rapist" are not the same.
He wasn't convicted due to the statute of limitations (~12 years for rape). We don't need to have a conviction to know he is a rapist.
So quit the bullshit.
My mistake. I suppose if you asked most Americans if they would vote for a rapist, they'd give you a resounding No.
But what if you ask them, would you vote for a sexually abusive forced digital penetrator? One with a reputation for walking into beauty pageant dressing rooms and dozens of accusations of sexual impropriety going back for years? It seems many Americans would say Yes, uwu!
They voted for Biden, knowing has a pattern of touching women and children inapprorpratly. .t's an open secret, and women don't want to be alone with him.
https://time.com/5578143/biden-inappropriate-touching/ https://www.businessinsider.com/joe-biden-allegations-women-2020-campaign-2019-6 https://news.yahoo.com/seven-women-have-now-accused-joe-biden-of-inappropriate-touching-131204785.html
Well yeah, gross. If you want my advice, don't vote for Biden, but also don't vote for that other guy. Either way, America loses.
You have to pick which one you think will do the best. After 1 term of each, to me it's an easy answer. Trump.
No, he is not a rapist, as he never had sex with that woman, but either way, rape is a crime, and he was not convicted of a crime.
Maybe you should read the difference between civil court and criminal court.
It is funny to see the liberals use the terms all wrong while being so confident. Trump was never charged with a crime. It was a civil claim that was hog wash.
That is no the conclusion the jury came to in their verdict.
I am defending logic and facts. It was a civil trial. It can't determine guilt, only liability.
Which clearly is saying he didn't criminally rape her. I mean how silly is that? A court saying since it didn't meet the legal standard, we are going to say it anyways. lol
Clown world.
Using the same definitions. Biden raped tara reade.
So either way we end up with a rapist in the White House.
So check your yard stick as well. Morally I have no issues voting for Trump.
She took to court forty years later when a democrat paid for the lawyer. She doesn’t know when it happened. Not the year, month, or anything but still posted with trump later in photos. I wouldn’t do that with my rapist.
Tara fled due to threats to her life. Even her husband confirmed the details in a court record in 1995. So this isn’t some issue that magically popped up. You’re just living in denial.
I am ok with Trump because i don’t believe her. She’s a liar or an idiot, I don’t trust either.
If it’s overturned in appeals, will you still be ranting the same?
I suspect you’re still mad that rittenhouse got away.
Nobody found him guilty of rape. The jury found him liable for sexual assault but specifically not for rape.
I see it as nothing more than a political attack. Otherwise, where are the criminal charges?
Actually incorrect. That would be beyond a reasonable doubt. The Burden for civil court is the preponderance of evidence.
If trump was convicted of the crime if rape. I wouldn’t vote for him but that hasn’t happened. Odd she didn’t want to press criminal charges. You’d think she’d want him in prison for raping her even though she doesn’t know when it happened and still posed with him afterwards. That’s clown world in a nutshell
Have you realized you're feeding a troll yet? You're making logical arguments to someone who is emotionally invested. Good fucking luck.