this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
284 points (78.7% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4547 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

do you even realize why people don't want to spread this kind of content?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understand I just think your argument is weak for it. You are telling someone to self censor news they post and you could just as easily self censor news you read.

If it's such a trigger topic for you that you lash out on someone posting news about it then maybe you need to self evaluate and make better choices about what news you take in.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are telling someone to self censor news they post and you could just as easily self censor news you read.

the problem isn't the news i as an individual am reading. you do not understand the problem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understand, I just dont think it is the "problem" you seem to think it is.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

so you're just oblivious to the last 8 years of US politics. okay.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been around the past 8 years. I'm just not trying to bury my head like an ostrich because I cant control what I read.

I get the argument that we shouldnt be revering these people by continually discussing them. But my beliefs are more along the lines that history should be discussed and the action of these people should be discussed so it stays in the forefront and people know.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

history proves that acknowledging this kind of threat legitimizes its power.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only if you cherry pick your history examples.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, legitimizing a minority resistance by giving it attention is an anomaly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Acknowledging something happened and discussing it is not the same as legitimizing something.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you've learned nothing over the last 8 years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actions like yours are what allowed the last 8 years to happen.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Explain how trump got elected.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This argument can be summarized as such:

You: We should ignore these people. Talking about them gives them power. Ignoring them makes them go away.

Me: Ignoring them allows them to do bad shit. Talking about the bad things they do allows everyone to understand they are bad people and should not be allowed power.

Rinse and repeat. You're obviously not going to convince me that burying my head in sand will make trump magically not a huge political threat and I'm not going to convince you that the best way to prevent people like trump is to make sure we loudly proclaim all the bad shit they do.

So if you just have to have the final word feel free to respond but as I've stated a few times. I think your political philosophy is not only idiotic but is what caused us to be in the situation we are in today. But I'm not going to respond to you about this topic any more.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

Enjoy trump for 4 more years.