Technology

57453 readers

4465 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

846

The HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementation (www.gamingonlinux.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

156 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As already mentioned, DisplayPort exists. The problem is adoption. Even getting DisplayPort adopted as the de facto standard for PC monitors hasn't done anything to get it built into TVs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

also there's still no alternative to hdmi-cec

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

DisplayPort supports CEC.

From Wikipedia:

The DisplayPort AUX channel is a half-duplex (bidirectional) data channel used for miscellaneous additional data beyond video and audio, such as EDID (I2C) or CEC commands.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

huh didn't know. does it work in practice tho?