Technology

57432 readers

4335 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

846

The HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementation (www.gamingonlinux.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

156 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Eli5, what are the security risks of my HDMI cable?

[–] [email protected] 79 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Piracy being easier is the only risk. Once again ruining the experience of legitimate customers to try and stop a thing that they have had no success at even slowing down.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 months ago

Even further, it made it more expensive to buy products from all the dumb licensing fees that all the middlemen try to shoehorn in.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago

The security of mega Corp IP.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

HDMI 2.1cspecs are closed source.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Having to use systems that swing to more closed solutions is going to degrade security in more places.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

First thing I could think of is taking advantage of the ARC to spy on you.