this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
79 points (96.5% liked)

Selfhosted

40394 readers
361 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi guys,
I just released a new version of MinMon. If you're looking for a minimalistic tool for monitoring and alarming, check out the documentation and give it try! And even more important: please leave some feedback as I'll have some spare time next month to - hopefully - make v1.0 happen, or at least v0.6.
Cheers!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Simple, clean, bloat-free" -- proceeds do use Docker lol.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In my opinion docker is simple. And only one dependancy is quite bloat-free in my book as well. :)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Bloat free is a single compiled binary that runs anywhere!!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

You can always compile it, it's just a single cargo command. 🤷‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

But oh yes, cool project :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's actually not a bad idea. There are a few downsides to this like the binary being quite big compared to the classical "one binary per architecture" style. I'll give it a though. The docker image is pretty small btw ;).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can simply not bundle typical libraries that are available in most systems and let package managers deal with those.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think the dependencies might actually be a problem for the "one binary fits all" solution. For a simple binary the user is responsible for the external dependencies. If by any chance you're using Arch, there a package in the AUR.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The docker image is pretty small btw ;).

Yes if you already have Docker. If don't use Docker you'll be installing a ton of stuff just for a single application.