Programming

17668 readers

143 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

257

White House: Future Software Should Be Memory Safe (www.whitehouse.gov)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

128 comments fedilink hide all child comments

On the one side I really like c and c++ because they’re fun and have great performance; they don’t feel like your fighting the language and let me feel sort of creative in the way I do things(compared with something like Rust or Swift).

On the other hand, when weighing one’s feelings against the common good, I guess it’s not really a contest. Plus I suspect a lot of my annoyance with languages like rust stems from not being as familiar with the paradigm. What do you all think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We need legislators who aren't all literally older than cryptography. If they weren't bought and paid for by billionaires that would be nice too.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That requires a population willing to vote for such legislators.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It requires score voting so that, even if heavily gerrymandered, one can still meaningfully express a preference without throwing one's ballot in the garbage.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

It's never throwing your ballot in the garbage though. I used to think the same way, but every vote on the left, even if for the lesser evil, even if they lose, moves the conversation to the left. When we all stay home you get maga nutjobs stealing the show running unchecked.

Last thing is that gerrymandered states are the EASIEST to upset by increasing voter turnout. To gerrymander effectively you have to put your opponent in dense areas they'll win by a large margin, then spread your side so that you barely win the rest of the districts. That means that a 5% increase in votes on the left can take you from a loss to a nearly complete victory in a gerrymandered state.

Vote splitting on the other hand is a trickier beast, but in the end if all the left votes go to a moderate then that gives the left a lot of leverage because if the moderate candidate doesn't bend to the left then they'll lose the next election.

Always vote.

[–] fruitycoder 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Election reforms require getting out to vote now even if its harder.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You are correct. I hope nobody thought I am against voting. Everyone needs to vote.

[–] fruitycoder 2 points 9 months ago

Mostly just saying it outload, I know I fall into the trap myself and just need reminding "perfect is the enemy of good" sometimes.