this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1928 readers
7 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Oh, good. ๐Ÿ™

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@realcaseyrollins @spoonful
Blowing the pipeline was unnecessary. The US and Germany could turn it off where it came out of the water. This was Russia's doing because only they have demonstrated zero regard for environmental damage from their actions.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@darthstar @spoonful

> This was Russia's doing because only they have demonstrated zero regard for environmental damage from their actions.

LOL! There's not even a connection between the two. That's like blaming #China for wildfires in #Canada because they've demonstrated that they don't care about pollution.

Is there any actual evidence linking #Russia to destroying what is, may I remind you, their own oil pipeline?

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like we're getting a bit too involved here. With so little evidence either way it's hard to make any reasonable conclusion.

Also note that you should not apply reason to anything Russia does. Much of their strategy is basically the "chaos is a ladder" meme from game of thrones.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

@spoonful Why are you afraid to say that the person who blew up #Russia's pipeline just might happen to be the country that, let's all remember, *is at war with them at the moment*

"Japan got hit with a nuke? Well, let's not make hasty judgements. Maybe the Japanese did it!"

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not afraid there's just literally zero convincing data either way.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

@spoonful Still, you can use logic to make a reasonable guess if you want to.

Like, I could say, "well, I think the dog poop in the backyard belongs to my dog, even though I didn't see him drop the dookie"