Technology

58011 readers

4380 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

386

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

77 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh, is that what those multiples meant? I never realized.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's the number of times faster it can read or burn compared to the original speed of reading and burning

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Does the 'original speed' mean what the natural playback would have been? So 60 minutes of audio burned by a x60 drive would take one minute?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but I think there was some overhead in the process that was slower.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Memory limitations. Back then RAM was like 512 max

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

You are correct. However, I mean initialization and finalizing.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD-R Looks like a 52x wrote at 7.8 MB/s. Things have changed.