this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
130 points (97.8% liked)
PC Gaming
8655 readers
665 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They have done better than that. They got the community to adapt their image to other devices. Now there is broader device support for mobile Linux gaming and they aren't on the hook to maintain it. But since it's open source, can't really be mad about it.
Sorry my implied meaning didn't come across. It's not better for users, it's better for Valve as they are not taking on responsibility for maintaining other devices.
It would be nice if Valve did that, but I don't see that happening. They have only done this much because Microsoft wanted to pull an Apple by not allow non-MS markets on Windows. At least with Valve being privately owned they are content to just keep feeding the goose laying the golden eggs.
The goal was to not lock down their hardware to someone else's operating system, it wasn't just to sell games on steam. Valve has always been very open about not wanting to be beholden to other corporations for their success and innovation. They realized they could have their own software and hardware platforms that work in tandem more efficiently than slapping windows on the deck due to owning both pieces of that puzzle. Not to mention they were paying modders under the table to help them build dxvk and integrate it into proton.
No other handhelds have adopted it most likely because the drivers aren't updated for the latest chipsets, which means all efficiency goes out the window (no pun intended). Sure you could probably run the updated Ryzen graphics on SteamOS but it probably wouldn't benefit the hardware as much as Windows would, considering most power efficiency on Windows is handled more by the OS and not the chipset drivers.
At this point what valve needs to do for more OEM adoption is provide better compatibility for SteamOS's integrated power management tools and expand the compatibility for SteamOS outside the steam deck hardware. Until that happens these handhelds will just opt for Windows instead because it's less overhead on the OEM partners.
The irony is now that the Deck is locked down to Valve's ecosystem, while other devices can play games from Steam too but also from Origin, GOG, Xbox, EA Play...
Steam deck is capable of installing apps from all of those stores except obviously Xbox... It's just an arch Linux desktop. It's probably the least locked down handheld computer you can buy. Not sure where you're getting this info that the deck is locked to valve's ecosystem.
Ayaneo already started taking preorders on a SteamOS based handheld, in addition to working on their own distro of Linux
Yeah and I'm pretty sure they already walked that back and decided to stick to Windows.
Source?
The same source as your (outdated) info -- the product page: https://www.ayaneo.com/product/AYANEO-NEXT-LITE.html
Probably would have made sense to start there first, right?