this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
86 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

1928 readers
7 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (28 children)

@RandomBit @jmcs I prefer #Matrix.

I don't find #Signal or #Telegram (which is worse, it's basically a honeypot) to be particularly secure, but I don't see anything other than something like those platforms catching on with the masses as a sort of #USA-centric #Whatsapp-style replacement for text messaging.

Both #Apple and #Google need to come up with a consensus on the successor for #MMS, or else I could see another platform or app replacing both.

[–] RandomBit 5 points 1 year ago (27 children)

What security issues does Signal have?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (19 children)

There are two legitimate concerns about Signal: they use real phone numbers as identifiers, and you have to trust Signal as the server operator as they don't allow their client to be used with other servers. While the server software is also open source, you have to trust that they're running the same version in production.

[–] RandomBit 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree; however, the second point I don't see as Signal specific. In any service, how do you verify that a server is running unmodified open source code? For the vast majority of people, they are also depending upon the client being unmodified.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If you could run your own Signal instance, then that could help alleviate concerns of bad faith operators. That's what Session is essentially (started as a fork of Signal): https://getsession.org

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)