this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
21 points (92.0% liked)

science

14670 readers
335 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
21
[meta] Lack of posting rules in /c/science (lemmy.world)
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I propose adding :
Rule #2 : Posts have to include scientific stuff with a related credible source.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Good idea in principle. Do peer-reviewed journals only count as credible? If not, what is your proposed criteria?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I mean, using peer teviewed journals and „credible“ in the same sentence these days is quite gutsy, ngl. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/feb/03/the-situation-has-become-appalling-fake-scientific-papers-push-research-credibility-to-crisis-point

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I would accept any article which try at least to be educational and sustain science // not confuse people or sell snake oil.