113
The descriptivist's dilemma (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/linguistics_humor

spoileralt text: A two panel comic. In the first panel there are two buttons labeled "I don't believe in prescriptivism" and "'Literally' cannot mean 'figuratively'". A finger hovers between the buttons. In the second panel, the finger's owner is sweating and wiping his brow, unable to decide.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] merc 1 points 5 months ago

That's because they're words used to provide emphasis in the same sense as the original word.

Very and verily are similar. I'm very tired, or verily I am tired. Maybe one is used more to say "to a great extent" and the other to mean "no kidding", but they're roughly the same. Same with truly from the root same root as "truth".

What makes "literally" vs. "figuratively" annoying is that literally used to mean "not figuratively", but is now used to emphasize a metaphor or a comparison.

So, "it's literally 5 tons" could mean either it's actually 5 tons, or that it's very heavy but probably nowhere near 5 tons. If someone actually wants to say that it is actually true that it is 5 tons, the worst word they can use to emphasize that truth is "literally".

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
113 points (92.5% liked)

Linguistics Humor

1006 readers
3 users here now

Do you like languages and linguistics ? Here is for having fun about it


Share this community: [[email protected]](/c/[email protected])


Serious Linguistics community: [email protected]


Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS