this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
1324 points (97.3% liked)

linuxmemes

20473 readers
747 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 49 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Did you ever had to buy a new laptop because Linux stopped supporting the current one?

[–] carpelbridgesyndrome 35 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I've had the reverse. I started using arch because debian didn't have my wifi driver yet.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Yeah WiFi seems to always be the biggest pain in the ass, and it’s still way easier than it was 15 years ago.

Haven’t had a single laptop with an issue, personally (though I only have bought Lenovo laptops in the past 7 years or so, but in that time I’ve bought 3). I’ve got one (really cheap) WiFi dongle I’ve had on my HTPC that had been a pain. Had I taken the time to choose the other really cheap one that had a different chipset, it would’ve worked out of the box. Oh well.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No but I am looking for a new laptop and this time I'll definitely spent more time checking Linux compatibility.

My previous thinkpad worked fine out of the box, but my current laptop is an HP Omen, that I mostly selected for the price to performance ratio. But I immediately learned that Linux compatibility sucked. Like not being able to boot an Ubuntu usb drive (without messing with the boot parameters).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Yeah before getting my current laptop I looked into the Linux compatibility. I went Thinkpad though this time and it honestly works amazingly. I can't use all the features (fingerprint mostly) but thats moreso because my setup doesn't have any way to rather than support not existing. And biometric ID can be less than useless when used as the sole security measure, such as unlocking your phone with your fingerprint. If someone wants the data on that device bad enough, they now have a means to get it.

And in response to XKCD 538, good luck getting me to clearly say my complicated ass password correctly after being beaten lmao. If I could I probably would

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I did the opposite. After one of the big updates, Windows 10 decided it was no longer going to work with the Vista-era drivers for an old Core 2 Duo laptop. To be fair to Microsoft, was I pretty impressed when I initially installed Windows 10 and it accepted those ancient drivers without any complaints on a laptop that was 10 years old at that time.

So I instead installed Manjaro and everything worked just fine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

No, since I mainly use Windows and replace my laptop at least once every 10 years.

  • Windows XP: 2001-2014
  • Windows Vista: 2007-2017
  • Windows 7: 2009-2020
  • Windows 8: 2012-2023
  • Windows 10: 2015-2025
  • Windows 11: 2021-...

TPM has existed in laptops since 2006

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

TPM has existed in laptops since 2006

Not particularly relevant. The only TPM that counts is TPM2, which was 2014 for the specification. Not even all "TPM 2.0" implementations are considered sufficient. Plenty of devices even in 2019 were being built without a TPM2 that would qualify for Windows 11, in part because the industry didn't know that it was about to be required, in part among those that tried not knowing their chosen implementation would still not qualify.