People Twitter

5394 readers

336 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas

pelespirit

504

Hard to fathom (lemmy.world)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/whitepeopletwitter

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (3 children)

You missed the point of the exercise.

What would you do with 50k?

100k?

200k

500k

10, 20, 50, 100, 250M?

500 Millions?

1B?

Then think how many people could have a better life with just a "meager" 50K... if some billionaire were taxed slightly more...

I'm not even talking about the vast majority of earths population that would see their life getting better with fifty bucks here and there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean for me anything after the 500k mark is just going to be givin away to people or communities in need. I can live off of 500k and a job for the rest of my life.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Personally I feel like I could do more good with super PACs by supporting politicians who would help those people and communities by forcing my fellow billionaires to also contribute. I don’t like the system I find myself in, but I don’t want to throw myself into the “Yet you participate in society. Curious!” hole.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Well, lots of people could do that, but are they?

Power corrupts and all that...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I get it but I don't trust the government to ever get better so I would rather give directly to the people or directly pay their bills so they don't get hit with the taxes from the money givin to them.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

You missed the point of the exercise

I didn’t answer your question in the way your script anticipated. I’m not your student.

If your script requires people to not know what they’d do with that much money, and then they do, it’s not a great rebuttal to tell them to stay on-script. That’s some Ray Comfort level rhetoric.

That said, I support far higher taxation of the wealthy. My criticism isn’t of your goal, but that your method is flawed enough to detract from it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

If you didn't get it, this is the reason:

You, and many others, use a multiplayer of 1.000 ; million, billion, trillion.

Those enormous steps exceeds human comprehension.

So use 2 instead.

Have a nice day mr grumpy!