Canada

8035 readers

698 users here now

What's going on Canada?

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 Sports

Hockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 2 years ago by sbv to c/[email protected]

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Okay, so we are having a public enquiry now?

From the article, it sounds like there were a number of allegations that Johnston didn't investigate, so that makes sense.

Getting the opposition parties to agree on the head of the enquiry before it starts seems like a good idea.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Wait, but if NDP and Liberals are both against a public inquiry, what's the end-game?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

what’s the end-game?

Presumably to keep the Conservative base mad at "the woke left"?

At least that appears to be PP's entire game.

[–] Grennum 4 points 2 years ago

Ideally the end game should be changes to ensure that our political process and institutions are free of inappropriate foreign influence.

[–] sbv 2 points 2 years ago

All of the opposition parties have been calling for a public inquiry.