this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
475 points (94.6% liked)

Bicycles

3143 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to [email protected]

A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!

Community Rules

Other cycling-related communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
475
Cycling is ten times more important than electric cars for reaching net-zero cities (theconversation.com)
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
114 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Globally, only one in 50 new cars were fully electric in 2020, and one in 14 in the UK. Sounds impressive, but even if all new cars were electric now, it would still take 15-20 years to replace the world’s fossil fuel car fleet.

The emission savings from replacing all those internal combustion engines with zero-carbon alternatives will not feed in fast enough to make the necessary difference in the time we can spare: the next five years. Tackling the climate and air pollution crises requires curbing all motorised transport, particularly private cars, as quickly as possible. Focusing solely on electric vehicles is slowing down the race to zero emissions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I live in Montréal. Commute by bike daily. And the city removes snow just fine. Even from bike lanes.

I had a similar experience in Toronto for the years I lived there. But Montréal is better at clearing bike paths.

[–] Grandwolf319 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The video points out that Toronto is not a good biking experience in the winter. Your probably the minority in therms of tolerating snow on roads.

Montreal has higher taxes allowing them to spend more. The whole small government philosophy is the crux of the issue and it effects a lot of things that would make this problem better like public transportation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

True about Toronto. But it's also pointing out how Toronto gets much less snow than most of the rest of Canada (apart from maybe Vancouver). But it draws a lot of comparisons with Oulu, where it snows much more than Toronto (and Montréal) but they actually do snow removal well.

Montréal's forte is the separated bike baths that zigzag across the city, creating a safe artery. And I'm not talking about Bloor, College/Gerrard or Davenport level painted stripes with broken barriers. But actual two-lane paths.

Toronto could have the same, at least as an artery kind, connecting the East and North East via Don Valley and Taylor Creek, West along the Humber. Alas there's no winter maintenance for some reason on these pathways.

Maybe things will change under Olivia.

[–] Grandwolf319 1 points 11 months ago

No I do agree that the video does provide a good argument that it is possible to fix. It’s pretty clear that with good, well maintained paths that more people will bike.

What I doubt is convincing Canadians that we need to spend a lot more building and cleaning up paths.

The video literally says it’s “laziness” whereas big infrastructure spending isn’t not attractive to North Americans. And their example of, “this one city figured it out” is not as convincing as “all of Europe figured it out”.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I remember vaguely an article from a few decades ago that claimed Montreal was the only Canadian city that at least tried to do snow clearing right.

Saskatoon, for example, is abysmal and always has been.

I once heard that property taxes would have to increase by a lousy $50/year to bring Saskatoon snow clearing up to Montreal standards. That's when I finally realized that governments at all levels, as they are currently organized, are basically useless when it comes to figuring out how to best serve the population.