this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
22 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7971 readers
1452 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For years, peanuts and tree nuts have been considered off-limits in school snacks and lunches as a key precaution to protect those with life-threatening allergies. However, as one Canadian school lifts that restriction, is the tide beginning to turn away from specific food bans?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Are eggs and fish banned too? Or are allergies less severe in general?

[–] PizzasDontWearCapes 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Peanuts are the hand grenade of allergies - you don't have to consume them to react if you are allergic

Everything else is relatively safe if you can keep from eating, or otherwise come into contact with it

source: father of a child who has many food allergies

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That's very interesting. I wonder if there's biological reasons for that.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My understanding is that nut allergies are common, the reactions are severe, there's more public awareness, it's easier to cut them out (eggs for example are more ubiquitous). At the same time they're more common than say shellfish

All of these factors change over time and it's not justification, just why it's the way it is right now

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The given reason when I was in school was that peanut oil residue could trigger a reaction, so if a kid eats a PB sandwich then touches a doorknob then that doorknob is touched by some other kid with a peanut allergy, that would be enough to trigger. No idea if that's true. It always annoyed me because PB is one of the most calorie dense foods and is easy to pack in a lunch, so my mom really wanted to be able to send me that. I often was hungry in elementary school because I didn't find the alternatives as filling or satisfying.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was completely out of school before the peanut bans kicked in. A good thing, too, as I basically lived on peanut butter. Still do. :) Even when I was working and packing my own lunches, it was either leftovers or peanut butter sandwiches. Food of the gods (or demons, I suppose...)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah I eat PB sandwiches basically every day. I'm autistic so I like the routine of eating the same thing, and PB is as good as you can get for food density to effort ratio.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Haven't nut allergies climbed over the years as well? PB was never banned when I was in school.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I believe nut allergies spiked for a period of time when we thought it was due to early exposure, so people kept their kids away from peanut and that led to much more people being allergic to them. They're now recommending that you expose your kids to common allergens as soon as possible to avoid this. I'm guessing the numbers are going back down enough that we're comfortable with allowing peanuts in schools again.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Those allergies are not nearly as common or severe. Also, someone won't eat a snack of shellfish and not wipe up after while nuts are constantly consumed by people who won't wash hands or surfaces when finished.

I am not allergic to anything food related really, but I have no problem with these restrictions, I can eat those foods in my home or a restaurant. I care about other people so it doesn't matter to me, but a selfish person would get very upset by these rules.