this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
203 points (92.1% liked)

People Twitter

6331 readers
1590 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There he is! The kid who got kicked out of school for plagarism

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you read thousands of different sources to learn about something and then write about it yourself, congrats, you've AI plagiarized.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a little more nuanced as AI models keep spitting out verbatim training data when people figure out the right queries. E.g. the other day they banned you from asking chat GPT to repeat the same word forever as it'd do that for a while, then just spew out something it had been trained on. If someone reads thousands of articles on a subject, then writes the exact contents of one of them, that's definitely plagiarism.

There's also the issue that when a human reads a lot, they have to pay for a lot of books and view a lot of ads and pay taxes that fund a library system buying books, too. The human extracts value from what they've read and gives something to its author. Megacorporations training AI models are only extracting the value and aren't paying for the privilege.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not like I said it is because it IS usually like I said it is, except in intentional edge cases. Got it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I said it was more nuanced than you said, which is pretty different to saying it's not like you said. There are big similarities to a human who's read lots of books, but the equivalent human is pirating all their media while being rich enough to pay for it, and sometimes passing off other people's writing as their own. Neither of those things are allowed when humans do them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Man, thats so far off base youve become the first human on pluto.

You think and reason. A math program running on a big computer doesnt. So, already, you are wrong.

But the theft and plagiarism isnt from the output from the large math program that chatgpts marketing team want you to think is artificial intelligence.

The primary problem is that they never had permissiom to feed other peoples things into their picture calculator in the first place.

It would be like if I illegally printed someone elses artwork on a canvas and used it at my job as an interior decorator to decorate an office. Or if I illegally printed a copy of a board game or card game and used those copies to host a pay-to-enter tournament.

Its a calculator, not a brain, and feeding it materials you do not have the permission to feed into it is theft.

Children understand this. How old are you?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There are highly degreed adults working in this field who disagree with you. But good job calling everyone who disagrees with you a child. That's super mature brah. You've claimed the moral high ground.